| 查看: 1005 | 回复: 3 | ||
shuyaping铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求'Research highlights' 以及'Responses to Technical Check Results' 标准模版
|
| 求Separation and Purification Technology的'Research highlights' 以及'Responses to Technical Check Results' 的标准写法，要求详细点，谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有11人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有4人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有10人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有5人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有5人回复
-
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有6人回复
-
面上项目申报
已经有3人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 稿件今天被拒不知什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 投Materials Science and Engineering: A时候Responses to Technical Check位置
已经有4人回复
- 投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有可能送审吗？
已经有14人回复
- 如何写'Responses to Technical Check Results'
已经有4人回复
- Materials and Design技术审查意见
已经有11人回复
- Responses to Technical Check Results
已经有3人回复
- 关于Responses to Technical Check Results
已经有7人回复
- 又被退回来了，'Responses to Technical Check Results' 问题。
已经有11人回复
- Responses to technical check results
已经有7人回复
- 投在elsevier上投稿后，要求提供Responses to Technical Check Results'.
已经有9人回复
hls85915
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
科研工具版——沙漠之胡
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4716 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 5.06
- 金币: 58800.4
- 散金: 11484
- 红花: 203
- 沙发: 56
- 帖子: 32316
- 在线: 1824小时
- 虫号: 1080748
- 注册: 2010-08-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 爆炸与冲击动力学
- 管辖: 科研工具
2楼2012-09-08 10:09:48
chere279
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 1544.8
- 散金: 95
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 728
- 在线: 236.8小时
- 虫号: 1163974
- 注册: 2010-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
3楼2012-09-08 10:14:10
【答案】应助回帖
|
给你一个模板，不知道有用么？ Dear editor, Thank you for your useful comments and suggestions on the language and the structure of our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript accordingly, and the detailed corrections are listed below point by point: 1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present their papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. We revised the WHOLE manuscript carefully to avoid language errors. In addition, we asked several colleagues who are skilled authors to check the English. We believe that the language is now acceptable for the review process. 2) Please note that your abstract (250 words) exceeds the maximum length of 150 words for research article. The abstract has been revised and the word count is now 149. 3) Figures should be cited sequentially in the text. Fig. 6 is provided, but not cited; please check and revise accordingly. Now all figures are provided and cited sequentially in the text. 4) The cover letter provided should include the following: the manuscript has not been previously published, is not currently submitted for review to any other journal, and will not be submitted elsewhere before one decision is made. The required information has been included in the cover letter. 5) Type the whole manuscript with uniform lettering and sizing, and with double line spacing, including references, figure captions and tables. We have typed the whole manuscript in uniform lettering and sizing, and with double line spacing. 6) Please note that the reference list must conform strictly to the Guide for Authors. Journal names should be abbreviated and page span should be provided. We have checked all the references and formatted them strictly according to the Guide for Authors. Especially the journal names have been abbreviated and page span provided. The manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We look forward to your positive response. |
4楼2012-09-25 13:31:39