| 查看: 1448 | 回复: 29 | |||
[交流]
IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析
|
|||
|
文章二审 两个审稿人意见返回后 又board level decision 一个月了 还没有信 是啥情况 ? 大家讨论交流一下,IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-9-11 at 23:08 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有7人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有6人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名(生物分析化学、药物递送)
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
青基代表作,AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗?还是归为workshop之流?
已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有6人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
诚征另一半
+1/165
限广州,征女友
+2/108
江苏科技大学能源材料化学课题组张俊豪教授招收博士研究生1-2名
+1/74
昆明理工大学冶能院离子液体冶金课题组招收博士
+1/65
香港理工大学-应用生物与化学科技学系 招收2025年博士研究生
+2/62
新年快乐!祝各位诸事顺遂!
+1/55
急招碳材料相关特任研究人员/博士后/科研助理/26级博士和硕士
+1/49
中国科学院大连化学物理研究所DNL0902研究组招聘博士后和职工
+1/40
衡水学院招收食品与营养方向联合培养研究生
+1/32
【招生啦招生啦】武汉理工大学朱曼副研究员招收2026年9月入学博士/硕士研究生
+1/28
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+2/28
南京工业大学招收2026年全日制学术博士(供热、供燃气通风与空调)
+1/13
211 院校 化学工程与技术 双一流学科 学术型博士研究生 尚有名额
+1/8
青岛大学 丁欣 课题组 招收2026秋化学博士1名
+1/8
哈尔滨工业大学招收硕士研究生(欢迎环境、市政、生物、化学、农业等专业,长期有效)
+1/7
操作说明书:Thermo Delta Q 稳定同位素比质谱仪
+1/4
中国科学院大连化学物理研究所DNL0902研究组招聘博士后和职工
+1/3
深容SCI智能体四大模块:Method, Introduction, Discussion, Abstract
+1/3
湖南大学机械与运载工程学院赵岩副教授课题组招生2026级普通博士生1名
+1/2
经济学博士(金融方向)招生,211重点大学,2026年9月入学,申请-考核制。
+1/1
10楼2012-09-05 11:09:52
14楼2012-09-05 13:32:58
16楼2012-09-05 21:23:09
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 09 05号 今天终于催稿了 不然 赶不上评奖了 Dear Editor(s) Please excuse me for taking some of your time. I submitted the revised manuscript entitled “ XXXXXX” (Ref:。。。) to J。。。about two months ago. And the revised manuscript is in board level decision state now. Maybe there is a decesion in next few days. Whether the decesion is good or not, we do appreciate your work and reviewers' comments for our manuscript! By the way, is there anything need us to do? and we are pleased to do that. Thank you very much for your time and consideration Best Wishes Sincerely yours, 。。。 |
17楼2012-09-06 20:53:41
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
我投JOPT碰过,用了一个半月时间。编委可能太忙,最后他给的意见是: 按第2审稿人意见修改后录用。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
18楼2012-09-07 14:51:05
19楼2012-09-07 15:58:01
|
Current status and history Date Task description Deadline date/Status 01/05/2008 Author revision required 02/06/2008 09/04/2008 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 27/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Referee 1's report The paper was written accurately. The expressions obtained are correct as far as I can see. Referee 2's report This is good quality work, and although not a major advance in the area, it is worth publishing. It is convenient to have this method available for .... The methods used are not new, but I have never seen the methods applied to this general case. The methods and motivations will be obvious to those knowledgeable with the literature, but not to the non-expert. There are several minor points of confusion, mostly related to the language imprecision. For example, in the paragraph after Eq. 18:"...". I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The physics seems to be fine. The English requires a careful edit. Board Member's report This seems a good quality paper that represents a useful advance. I recommend acceptance with consideration of the points raised by the 2nd reviewer. [ Last edited by runnymede on 2012-9-7 at 18:56 ] |
20楼2012-09-07 18:55:04
21楼2012-09-08 12:17:55
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
出现Board level decision说明审稿人意见不一致(而且很可能是负面的意见),本人刚好也经历过类似的状况: Date Task description Deadline date/Status 15/08/2012 Check proof Proof corrections received 02/08/2012 Referee reports Accepted 13/07/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 11/07/2012 Author revision required Closed 02/07/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 20/06/2012 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 17/05/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 28/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 一审时两个审稿意见都还行,但是修改时没完全按照其中一个审稿人的意见来补充参考文献,结果二审时被那个审稿人批得一无是处,还好编委仲裁的结果是再给一次修改机会。第二次提交修改稿后,编辑部又出了个无厘头的错误,就是上面显示的那个“Author revision required Closed ”,差点让我修改第三次……好在最后录用了 |
23楼2012-09-08 17:10:54
26楼2012-09-08 21:21:24
27楼2012-09-10 18:54:13
28楼2012-09-10 18:55:58
|
见这个http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4940570 这篇稿子的命运 还不知道呢 从邮件最后看是可以不改也可以出版的!! 我选择了 不修改了 我也不知道可不可以啊!! |
29楼2012-09-10 22:03:34
12楼2012-09-05 11:57:08
13楼2012-09-05 12:30:08
30楼2012-09-11 22:26:50
简单回复
2012-09-04 19:37
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
neu2343楼
2012-09-04 20:08
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:25
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6176楼
2012-09-04 20:28
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:38
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:53
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
and_you9楼
2012-09-04 20:55
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与

gmin11楼
2012-09-05 11:18
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liyangsoton15楼
2012-09-05 15:15
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
mailinator22楼
2012-09-08 15:59
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空24楼
2012-09-08 17:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与


gcworm25楼
2012-09-08 17:49
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与







回复此楼
wangdongwind