| 查看: 1454 | 回复: 29 | |||
[交流]
IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析
|
|||
|
文章二审 两个审稿人意见返回后 又board level decision 一个月了 还没有信 是啥情况 ? 大家讨论交流一下,IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-9-11 at 23:08 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有5人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
诚征另一半
+1/153
科瑞赛生物内皮细胞培养基试用装限时大放送,助力你的实验高效进阶!
+1/92
澳门大学智慧城市物联网国重“结构智能感知、健康监测与无损检测”研究方向博士后招聘
+1/82
内蒙古大学能源材料化学研究院招聘2026年博士生
+1/80
香港理工大学-应用生物与化学科技学系 招收2025年博士研究生
+2/50
2026博士申请——有机化学\计算化学\药物化学方向
+1/44
坐标济南,山东农科院招 有机合成 or 药物化学 联培硕士研究生
+1/41
华中科技大学龚江研究员课题组诚招博士研究生、科研助理和博士后
+3/33
西北工业大学无人飞行器技术全国重点实验室拟招收电机/自动化方向博士1~2名
+1/31
福建师范大学柔性电子学院招收2026年博士(储能材料与柔性电子器件)
+2/28
王志博教授课题组招收硕士研究生(本招收信息长期有效)
+2/20
南京工业大学招收2026年全日制学术博士(供热、供燃气通风与空调)
+1/14
中科院深圳理工大学网络课题组招聘博后/RA/实习生
+1/12
博士/硕士招生
+1/10
上海大学张进教授课题组诚招2026年秋季博士研究生
+1/7
上海大学张进教授课题组诚招2026年秋季博士研究生
+1/5
上海理工大学“新能源材料”专业-赵斌教授招收申请考核制博士生【能源催化方向】
+1/3
211 院校 化学工程与技术 双一流学科 学术型博士研究生 尚有名额
+1/3
福州大学梁宇航副教授招收2026年申核制博士研究生/硕士研究生(理论计算方向)
+1/1
西交利物浦大学——全奖博士名额(基因组学方向)
+1/1
10楼2012-09-05 11:09:52
14楼2012-09-05 13:32:58
16楼2012-09-05 21:23:09
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 09 05号 今天终于催稿了 不然 赶不上评奖了 Dear Editor(s) Please excuse me for taking some of your time. I submitted the revised manuscript entitled “ XXXXXX” (Ref:。。。) to J。。。about two months ago. And the revised manuscript is in board level decision state now. Maybe there is a decesion in next few days. Whether the decesion is good or not, we do appreciate your work and reviewers' comments for our manuscript! By the way, is there anything need us to do? and we are pleased to do that. Thank you very much for your time and consideration Best Wishes Sincerely yours, 。。。 |
17楼2012-09-06 20:53:41
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
我投JOPT碰过,用了一个半月时间。编委可能太忙,最后他给的意见是: 按第2审稿人意见修改后录用。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
18楼2012-09-07 14:51:05
19楼2012-09-07 15:58:01
|
Current status and history Date Task description Deadline date/Status 01/05/2008 Author revision required 02/06/2008 09/04/2008 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 27/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Referee 1's report The paper was written accurately. The expressions obtained are correct as far as I can see. Referee 2's report This is good quality work, and although not a major advance in the area, it is worth publishing. It is convenient to have this method available for .... The methods used are not new, but I have never seen the methods applied to this general case. The methods and motivations will be obvious to those knowledgeable with the literature, but not to the non-expert. There are several minor points of confusion, mostly related to the language imprecision. For example, in the paragraph after Eq. 18:"...". I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The physics seems to be fine. The English requires a careful edit. Board Member's report This seems a good quality paper that represents a useful advance. I recommend acceptance with consideration of the points raised by the 2nd reviewer. [ Last edited by runnymede on 2012-9-7 at 18:56 ] |
20楼2012-09-07 18:55:04
21楼2012-09-08 12:17:55
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
出现Board level decision说明审稿人意见不一致(而且很可能是负面的意见),本人刚好也经历过类似的状况: Date Task description Deadline date/Status 15/08/2012 Check proof Proof corrections received 02/08/2012 Referee reports Accepted 13/07/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 11/07/2012 Author revision required Closed 02/07/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 20/06/2012 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 17/05/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 28/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 一审时两个审稿意见都还行,但是修改时没完全按照其中一个审稿人的意见来补充参考文献,结果二审时被那个审稿人批得一无是处,还好编委仲裁的结果是再给一次修改机会。第二次提交修改稿后,编辑部又出了个无厘头的错误,就是上面显示的那个“Author revision required Closed ”,差点让我修改第三次……好在最后录用了 |
23楼2012-09-08 17:10:54
26楼2012-09-08 21:21:24
27楼2012-09-10 18:54:13
28楼2012-09-10 18:55:58
|
见这个http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4940570 这篇稿子的命运 还不知道呢 从邮件最后看是可以不改也可以出版的!! 我选择了 不修改了 我也不知道可不可以啊!! |
29楼2012-09-10 22:03:34
12楼2012-09-05 11:57:08
13楼2012-09-05 12:30:08
30楼2012-09-11 22:26:50
简单回复
2012-09-04 19:37
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
neu2343楼
2012-09-04 20:08
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:25
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6176楼
2012-09-04 20:28
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:38
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:53
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
and_you9楼
2012-09-04 20:55
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与

gmin11楼
2012-09-05 11:18
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liyangsoton15楼
2012-09-05 15:15
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
mailinator22楼
2012-09-08 15:59
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空24楼
2012-09-08 17:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与


gcworm25楼
2012-09-08 17:49
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与







回复此楼
wangdongwind