| 查看: 1463 | 回复: 29 | |||
[交流]
IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析
|
|||
|
文章二审 两个审稿人意见返回后 又board level decision 一个月了 还没有信 是啥情况 ? 大家讨论交流一下,IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-9-11 at 23:08 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
基金申报
已经有5人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有7人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有17人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有8人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
计算机、0854电子信息(085401-058412)调剂
已经有5人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有5人回复
溴的反应液脱色
已经有7人回复
推荐一本书
已经有12人回复
常年博士招收(双一流,工科)
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
南京大学能源与资源学院-景旭东教授 (英国皇家工程院院士) 团队博士后招聘
+1/475
招收2026年春-申请考核博士生-仿生组装/生物能源方向
+1/179
上海科技大学物质科学与技术学院|王平鸾课题组长期招聘(博后/博硕/科研助理)
+1/171
深圳大学水科学中心HydroS课题组招收化学/环境相关专业博士生1名(2026年入学)
+1/83
供应EXAKT德国艾卡特3D打印材料分散用三辊研磨机80E PLUS
+1/80
招聘:中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所
+1/77
上海交通大学任垭萌课题组招聘申请-考核博士
+1/76
锌离子混合电容器
+1/72
坐标广州,诚征男友,大个子女生,非诚勿扰
+2/64
中国科学院大连化学物理研究所-环境催化工程研究组(DNL 902组)事业编外项目聘用人员
+2/46
香港科技大学显示与光电国家重点实验室招收量子点钙钛矿光电液晶显示方向博士生
+1/31
帮导师招2026CSC博士(巴塞罗那自治大学UAB-CSC博士项目)
+1/23
江西理工大学 稀土学院(发光材料与器件研究所) 招收2026届 材料类博士研究生 2名
+2/20
浙江大学信息光子材料与器件实验室诚聘博士后、科研助理
+1/16
南京林业大学木质纤维功能材料国际联合创新中心招收2025级博士生(申请-考核制)
+2/14
浙江大学赵俊杰课题组长期招聘博士后及科研相关岗位启事
+1/9
武汉双一流高校干细胞与肿瘤生物学团队招聘2026级申请考核制博士生
+1/8
[请教]审稿意见回复
+1/6
华中科技大学 煤燃烧全重 紧急招博士生报考 (1月19日截止)
+1/5
重庆大学诚招2026年生物材料方向博士生
+1/3
10楼2012-09-05 11:09:52
14楼2012-09-05 13:32:58
16楼2012-09-05 21:23:09
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 09 05号 今天终于催稿了 不然 赶不上评奖了 Dear Editor(s) Please excuse me for taking some of your time. I submitted the revised manuscript entitled “ XXXXXX” (Ref:。。。) to J。。。about two months ago. And the revised manuscript is in board level decision state now. Maybe there is a decesion in next few days. Whether the decesion is good or not, we do appreciate your work and reviewers' comments for our manuscript! By the way, is there anything need us to do? and we are pleased to do that. Thank you very much for your time and consideration Best Wishes Sincerely yours, 。。。 |
17楼2012-09-06 20:53:41
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
我投JOPT碰过,用了一个半月时间。编委可能太忙,最后他给的意见是: 按第2审稿人意见修改后录用。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
18楼2012-09-07 14:51:05
19楼2012-09-07 15:58:01
|
Current status and history Date Task description Deadline date/Status 01/05/2008 Author revision required 02/06/2008 09/04/2008 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 27/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Referee 1's report The paper was written accurately. The expressions obtained are correct as far as I can see. Referee 2's report This is good quality work, and although not a major advance in the area, it is worth publishing. It is convenient to have this method available for .... The methods used are not new, but I have never seen the methods applied to this general case. The methods and motivations will be obvious to those knowledgeable with the literature, but not to the non-expert. There are several minor points of confusion, mostly related to the language imprecision. For example, in the paragraph after Eq. 18:"...". I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The physics seems to be fine. The English requires a careful edit. Board Member's report This seems a good quality paper that represents a useful advance. I recommend acceptance with consideration of the points raised by the 2nd reviewer. [ Last edited by runnymede on 2012-9-7 at 18:56 ] |
20楼2012-09-07 18:55:04
21楼2012-09-08 12:17:55
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
出现Board level decision说明审稿人意见不一致(而且很可能是负面的意见),本人刚好也经历过类似的状况: Date Task description Deadline date/Status 15/08/2012 Check proof Proof corrections received 02/08/2012 Referee reports Accepted 13/07/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 11/07/2012 Author revision required Closed 02/07/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 20/06/2012 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 17/05/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 28/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 一审时两个审稿意见都还行,但是修改时没完全按照其中一个审稿人的意见来补充参考文献,结果二审时被那个审稿人批得一无是处,还好编委仲裁的结果是再给一次修改机会。第二次提交修改稿后,编辑部又出了个无厘头的错误,就是上面显示的那个“Author revision required Closed ”,差点让我修改第三次……好在最后录用了 |
23楼2012-09-08 17:10:54
26楼2012-09-08 21:21:24
27楼2012-09-10 18:54:13
28楼2012-09-10 18:55:58
|
见这个http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4940570 这篇稿子的命运 还不知道呢 从邮件最后看是可以不改也可以出版的!! 我选择了 不修改了 我也不知道可不可以啊!! |
29楼2012-09-10 22:03:34
12楼2012-09-05 11:57:08
13楼2012-09-05 12:30:08
30楼2012-09-11 22:26:50
简单回复
2012-09-04 19:37
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
neu2343楼
2012-09-04 20:08
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:25
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6176楼
2012-09-04 20:28
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:38
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:53
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
and_you9楼
2012-09-04 20:55
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与

gmin11楼
2012-09-05 11:18
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liyangsoton15楼
2012-09-05 15:15
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
mailinator22楼
2012-09-08 15:59
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空24楼
2012-09-08 17:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与


gcworm25楼
2012-09-08 17:49
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与











回复此楼
wangdongwind