| 查看: 1736 | 回复: 29 | |||
[交流]
IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析
|
|||
|
文章二审 两个审稿人意见返回后 又board level decision 一个月了 还没有信 是啥情况 ？ 大家讨论交流一下，IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-9-11 at 23:08 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
某些机构，以效率低为荣，以效率低作为存在感
已经有10人回复
-
今天务委会开完了，明天出结果吗
已经有11人回复
-
有没有大神帮我看看基金代码
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有23人回复
-
在坚冰还盖着北海的时候，我看到了怒放的梅花。
已经有8人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有22人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有18人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有13人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有8人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
告别流水线爽文！108万字完结仙侠《女娲石之灵石奇缘（仙界篇）》值得细品
+1/5021
-
2026年工程管理与智慧城市国际会议 (EMSC 2026)
+1/590
-
真诚征友
+1/174
-
基金祈福
+1/153
-
散金币
+1/120
-
[IEEE出版|EI检索|推荐至SCI专刊]第22届国际电子商务工程会议征稿3天倒计时!
+1/98
-
从反复试错到智驱突破：固态电池研发的效率跃迁之路
+1/89
-
华中科技大学罗志强教授课题组招收2027年秋季入学博士研究生
+2/54
-
论文祈福
+1/23
-
祈福基金得中，科研生涯顺利圆满
+1/14
-
【即将截止】东北大学理学院 力学 李健组2027级保研
+1/7
-
中山大学智能传感仪器方向招2027届考核制博士生
+1/6
-
中山大学可穿戴电路系统方向招2027届考核制博士生
+1/5
-
中科院大连化学物理研究所 招聘 催化剂研发方向 科研助理 2名
+1/4
-
南京大学 智能驱动与感知材料实验室 诚招申请考核博士生/科研助理/博士后
+1/4
-
祈祷老公中国基
+1/3
-
新审查指南施行半年，AI方向的专利申请是不是更看"技术味"了？
+1/2
-
南方医科大学深圳医院陈烨/余涛教授课题组联合培养博士后招聘
+1/2
-
出全新蔡司 Plan?APOCHROMAT 20×/0.8 平场复消色差物镜
+1/2
-
博士后申请基金命中的概率有多大？
+1/1
10楼2012-09-05 11:09:52
14楼2012-09-05 13:32:58
16楼2012-09-05 21:23:09
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 09 05号 今天终于催稿了 不然 赶不上评奖了 Dear Editor(s) Please excuse me for taking some of your time. I submitted the revised manuscript entitled “ XXXXXX” (Ref:。。。) to J。。。about two months ago. And the revised manuscript is in board level decision state now. Maybe there is a decesion in next few days. Whether the decesion is good or not, we do appreciate your work and reviewers' comments for our manuscript! By the way, is there anything need us to do? and we are pleased to do that. Thank you very much for your time and consideration Best Wishes Sincerely yours, 。。。 |
17楼2012-09-06 20:53:41
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
我投JOPT碰过，用了一个半月时间。编委可能太忙，最后他给的意见是： 按第2审稿人意见修改后录用。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
wangdongwind18楼2012-09-07 14:51:05
19楼2012-09-07 15:58:01
|
Current status and history Date Task description Deadline date/Status 01/05/2008 Author revision required 02/06/2008 09/04/2008 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 27/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Referee 1's report The paper was written accurately. The expressions obtained are correct as far as I can see. Referee 2's report This is good quality work, and although not a major advance in the area, it is worth publishing. It is convenient to have this method available for .... The methods used are not new, but I have never seen the methods applied to this general case. The methods and motivations will be obvious to those knowledgeable with the literature, but not to the non-expert. There are several minor points of confusion, mostly related to the language imprecision. For example, in the paragraph after Eq. 18:"...". I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The physics seems to be fine. The English requires a careful edit. Board Member's report This seems a good quality paper that represents a useful advance. I recommend acceptance with consideration of the points raised by the 2nd reviewer. [ Last edited by runnymede on 2012-9-7 at 18:56 ] |
20楼2012-09-07 18:55:04
21楼2012-09-08 12:17:55
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
出现Board level decision说明审稿人意见不一致（而且很可能是负面的意见），本人刚好也经历过类似的状况： Date Task description Deadline date/Status 15/08/2012 Check proof Proof corrections received 02/08/2012 Referee reports Accepted 13/07/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 11/07/2012 Author revision required Closed 02/07/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 20/06/2012 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 17/05/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 28/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 一审时两个审稿意见都还行，但是修改时没完全按照其中一个审稿人的意见来补充参考文献，结果二审时被那个审稿人批得一无是处，还好编委仲裁的结果是再给一次修改机会。第二次提交修改稿后，编辑部又出了个无厘头的错误，就是上面显示的那个“Author revision required Closed ”，差点让我修改第三次……好在最后录用了 |
23楼2012-09-08 17:10:54
26楼2012-09-08 21:21:24
27楼2012-09-10 18:54:13
28楼2012-09-10 18:55:58
|
见这个http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4940570 这篇稿子的命运 还不知道呢 从邮件最后看是可以不改也可以出版的！！ 我选择了 不修改了 我也不知道可不可以啊！！ |
29楼2012-09-10 22:03:34
12楼2012-09-05 11:57:08
13楼2012-09-05 12:30:08
30楼2012-09-11 22:26:50
简单回复
2012-09-04 19:37
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
neu2343楼
2012-09-04 20:08
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:25
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6176楼
2012-09-04 20:28
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:38
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:53
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
and_you9楼
2012-09-04 20:55
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gmin11楼
2012-09-05 11:18
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liyangsoton15楼
2012-09-05 15:15
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
mailinator22楼
2012-09-08 15:59
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空24楼
2012-09-08 17:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gcworm25楼
2012-09-08 17:49
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
