| 查看: 1689 | 回复: 29 | |||
[交流]
IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析
|
|||
|
文章二审 两个审稿人意见返回后 又board level decision 一个月了 还没有信 是啥情况 ？ 大家讨论交流一下，IOP 的board level decision 后文章的命运 调查 及 讨论 最好有牛人解析 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-9-11 at 23:08 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
8月时间戳变的，举个手。玩一下，释放压力
已经有3人回复
-
有没有H口的？有收到消息的吗？
已经有3人回复
-
十年后又回来了，论文投稿求助
已经有3人回复
-
纯娱乐，不喜欢勿喷
已经有10人回复
-
面上再次挂了，太难了，躺也躺不了，倦也卷不过，小学校之殇！
已经有26人回复
-
面上提前没消息，有中的吗
已经有18人回复
-
娱乐
已经有4人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有16人回复
-
一个有机合成实验室都需要哪些设备？
已经有10人回复
-
什么时候能放榜呀？
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
具身智能机器人公司招聘硬件工程师岗位 预算100万内
+1/86
-
威格科技张德龙：二十年深耕，铸就国产惰性气氛设备新高度
+1/84
-
南京大学医工交叉方向招聘脂质纳米材料与RNA递送方向博士后1-2名
+1/78
-
国家纳米科学中心段鹏飞课题组招收2027年入学博士研究生
+1/77
-
药化高级研究员
+1/77
-
南京大学医工交叉方向薛璐璐团队招聘脂质纳米材料与RNA递送方向博士后1-2名
+1/75
-
中科院东莞材料所依托中科大招收2027届推免生
+1/33
-
有机合成高级研究员
+1/28
-
福建师范大学海峡柔性电子学院-2027年9月入学博士-考核制-电催、能源
+1/15
-
《上海高薪》VS《中科院》
+1/14
-
多本Scopus收录国际英文期刊征稿，全免 APC！含医学期刊
+1/4
-
北京师范大学（珠海校区）赵亚然副教授招收2027年电催化推免硕士/博士研究生
+1/4
-
高弯曲强度玻璃制品的特殊加工工艺
+1/4
-
北理工集成电路杰青团队 | 诚招科助理
+1/4
-
2027年硕士推免生 招生--哈尔滨工业大学王磊
+1/3
-
北京师范大学（珠海校区）赵亚然副教授招收2027年电催化硕士/博士研究生
+1/3
-
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/3
-
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/2
-
准现货/原装全新超微整机8x NVIDIA HGX A100 80G
+1/2
-
西安交通大学储能电催化团队诚招硕士/博士研究生
+1/1
10楼2012-09-05 11:09:52
14楼2012-09-05 13:32:58
16楼2012-09-05 21:23:09
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 09 05号 今天终于催稿了 不然 赶不上评奖了 Dear Editor(s) Please excuse me for taking some of your time. I submitted the revised manuscript entitled “ XXXXXX” (Ref:。。。) to J。。。about two months ago. And the revised manuscript is in board level decision state now. Maybe there is a decesion in next few days. Whether the decesion is good or not, we do appreciate your work and reviewers' comments for our manuscript! By the way, is there anything need us to do? and we are pleased to do that. Thank you very much for your time and consideration Best Wishes Sincerely yours, 。。。 |
17楼2012-09-06 20:53:41
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
我投JOPT碰过，用了一个半月时间。编委可能太忙，最后他给的意见是： 按第2审稿人意见修改后录用。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
wangdongwind18楼2012-09-07 14:51:05
19楼2012-09-07 15:58:01
|
Current status and history Date Task description Deadline date/Status 01/05/2008 Author revision required 02/06/2008 09/04/2008 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 27/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 26/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Report received 22/02/2008 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Referee 1's report The paper was written accurately. The expressions obtained are correct as far as I can see. Referee 2's report This is good quality work, and although not a major advance in the area, it is worth publishing. It is convenient to have this method available for .... The methods used are not new, but I have never seen the methods applied to this general case. The methods and motivations will be obvious to those knowledgeable with the literature, but not to the non-expert. There are several minor points of confusion, mostly related to the language imprecision. For example, in the paragraph after Eq. 18:"...". I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The physics seems to be fine. The English requires a careful edit. Board Member's report This seems a good quality paper that represents a useful advance. I recommend acceptance with consideration of the points raised by the 2nd reviewer. [ Last edited by runnymede on 2012-9-7 at 18:56 ] |
20楼2012-09-07 18:55:04
21楼2012-09-08 12:17:55
★
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
出现Board level decision说明审稿人意见不一致（而且很可能是负面的意见），本人刚好也经历过类似的状况： Date Task description Deadline date/Status 15/08/2012 Check proof Proof corrections received 02/08/2012 Referee reports Accepted 13/07/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 11/07/2012 Author revision required Closed 02/07/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 20/06/2012 Manuscript for Board level decision Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 30/05/2012 Revised manuscript to referee Report received 17/05/2012 Author revision required Revised manuscript received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 23/04/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 28/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Report received 27/03/2012 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 一审时两个审稿意见都还行，但是修改时没完全按照其中一个审稿人的意见来补充参考文献，结果二审时被那个审稿人批得一无是处，还好编委仲裁的结果是再给一次修改机会。第二次提交修改稿后，编辑部又出了个无厘头的错误，就是上面显示的那个“Author revision required Closed ”，差点让我修改第三次……好在最后录用了 |
23楼2012-09-08 17:10:54
26楼2012-09-08 21:21:24
27楼2012-09-10 18:54:13
28楼2012-09-10 18:55:58
|
见这个http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4940570 这篇稿子的命运 还不知道呢 从邮件最后看是可以不改也可以出版的！！ 我选择了 不修改了 我也不知道可不可以啊！！ |
29楼2012-09-10 22:03:34
12楼2012-09-05 11:57:08
13楼2012-09-05 12:30:08
30楼2012-09-11 22:26:50
简单回复
2012-09-04 19:37
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
neu2343楼
2012-09-04 20:08
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:25
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6176楼
2012-09-04 20:28
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:38
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2012-09-04 20:53
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
and_you9楼
2012-09-04 20:55
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gmin11楼
2012-09-05 11:18
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liyangsoton15楼
2012-09-05 15:15
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
mailinator22楼
2012-09-08 15:59
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空24楼
2012-09-08 17:20
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gcworm25楼
2012-09-08 17:49
回复
wangdongwind(金币+1): 谢谢参与