| 查看: 1702 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
apl审稿意见求助
|
||
|
编辑意见：The reviewer was favorably impressed, but has made further suggestions for improvements. The reviewer's comments are included below and/or attached. Please follow the suggestions where you find them appropriate and return the revised manuscript for publication. Please indicate how the manuscript has been revised in a separate Response Letter file so that the editors can see whether you have complied with the reviewer's comments. Please use ADD FILE to upload the Response Letter file and use REPLACE for any files that have been revised or changed. Revised manuscripts must be submitted through the online submission system. They are not accepted by email. 审稿人意见：Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with optional revision Paper Interesting: Yes Original Paper: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: Yes Clear and Error Free: Yes Conclusions Supported: Yes Appropriate Title: Yes Good Abstract: Yes Satisfactory English: Yes Adequate References: Yes Clear Figures: Yes OVERALL RATING: Good Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author): The processing impact on charge density of AlGaN/AlN/GaN HFET grown by MBE on sapphire substrates were reported and explained by authors. The model was that the stress-enhanced metal (Ti, Ni, and Au) diffusion into strained AlGaN barrier layer is the physics behind the observations. Authors have spent some effort to address my previous comments, including. • The evaluation of metal diffusion into barriers. Authors said further and systematic study is needed. • The quality of the MBE grown epi structure was accessed by author as " demonstrated that the quality ... is perfect." • The electrical quality of the epi structure before processing was measured by Hall at varied temp, with data shown stable carrier conc, indicating the quality of the epi. Authors may choose publish it as is and follow up with data from further systematic study. 各位大神看看有希望么？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有9人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有19人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 哪位好人能给我发一份APL(应用物理快报)的word模板？
已经有6人回复
- 求助APL投稿图片分辨率问题
已经有10人回复
- ECM审稿意见返回了，求各位帮忙解读一下，谢谢
已经有28人回复
- 审稿意见怎么写
已经有6人回复
- SCI论文一审回来审稿人意见相差非常大如何修改？
已经有19人回复
- APL materials投稿，有点后悔了！
已经有11人回复
- APL二审这个状态是不是换审稿人了?
已经有34人回复
- 请帮忙分析审稿意见：correct the figures of merit of values
已经有6人回复
- APL审稿意见回来了，我却崩溃了！
已经有36人回复
- （求助）APL under reviewing一个月了，没点消息啊。不知道怎么回事
已经有6人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- APL这种情况出现，是什么意思呢？
已经有24人回复
- apl投稿状态疑问
已经有17人回复
- APL 被拒了还会有revise链接吗
已经有17人回复
- APL审稿意见
已经有15人回复
6楼2012-08-15 20:17:30
yaozi358
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 62 (初中生)
- 金币: 409.1
- 散金: 289
- 帖子: 749
- 在线: 97.5小时
- 虫号: 1165225
- 注册: 2010-12-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
2楼2012-08-15 16:07:50
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2012-08-15 16:45:41
4楼2012-08-15 16:57:16
20