24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2120  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

李大庆

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 编辑没有给出任何意见,只有审稿人的意见,请大牛给看看,催化学报

The authors report a nice application ofXXXXXXX. A slight improvement in the yield of targeted products by XXXX was observed in a shorter reaction time when comparing with that of XXXX. However, only substituted benzaldehydes were examined in this article, which partially restricted the synthetic potentiality of this protocol.
minor revision:
1) Chang “arylaldehydes” to “ substituted benzaldehydes” in abstract
2)  “bsolated yield” should be “isolated”

The manuscript entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" report a method for the preparation of XXXXX , it seems the time and yield are good in comparison with the others.

The first page of Introduction is similar to most of published papers; I recommend it would be better slightly changed.

If the catalyst prepared for the first time, it should be mentioned, others should be referenced. Beside this, I recommend the author’s report pH of the catalyst? Mp if possible and characterized by NMR as compared the IR and NMR with xxx.

Table 1, column Solvent should be deleted as all of them are EtOH and reported solvent in caption. Also. Tables 2 for conditions do the same.

Table 3, product 3a-3k should be shown as bold.

Refertence 15b corrected as: (b) Tayebi S, Baghernejad M, Niknam K. Chin J Catal, xxxx, xx: xxxx.
Page 2, Line 11 “and Shekoofeh T et al. [15] reported …” corrected as “and Tayebi S et al. [15] reported …”   
请问编辑没有给出任何意见,这是小修啊还是大修啊?真让人郁闷

[ Last edited by 李大庆 on 2012-8-3 at 20:37 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
李大庆: 金币+1 2012-08-04 13:22:24
李大庆: 金币+1, 嗯 2012-08-05 22:30:57
那就按照审稿人的意见改吧
6楼2012-08-03 23:12:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
李大庆: 金币+1 2012-08-03 20:46:27
猪会飞: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-08-03 21:04:00
很明显是修改啊,好好改改。希望不小
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
2楼2012-08-03 20:44:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

李大庆

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sesame_oil at 2012-08-03 20:44:42
很明显是修改啊,好好改改。希望不小

可是编辑没有任何意见呢
3楼2012-08-03 20:46:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

1501311

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
李大庆: 金币+1, 谢谢 2012-08-03 20:57:11
猪会飞: 金币+3, 鼓励交流 2012-08-03 21:04:17
李大庆: 金币+1 2012-08-04 13:22:59
李大庆: 金币+1, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢, 2012-08-05 22:30:32
你先按照审稿人的意见都改好了,然后再把文章从前到后仔细的再检查几遍,最后再把语言好好润色一下,基本就能接受,很容易的,因为审稿人的意见基本就是个小修,恭喜啊!
4楼2012-08-03 20:54:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见