| ²é¿´: 4991 | »Ø¸´: 13 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
woodymusicÒø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ó¼Ò°ï¿´ÏÂIEEE TVTµÄÖØÍ¶ÊDz»ÊDZ¯¾çÁ˰¡
|
|
|
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¬Õâ¸öÊDz»ÊÇÏ£Íû²»´óÁË£¿ÎҸоõͶÃÀ¹úµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬Ó¢ÓïºÜ¹Ø¼ü°¡¡£¡£¡£¡£ ¸÷λ´óÉñ£¬°ï°ïСµÜ°¡ ÏÂÃæÊÇAE¸øµÄ½á¹û The review of your paper has been completed. Below please find comments from the reviewers. > The reviewers have raised concerns toward the presentation > of the manuscript, the justification of the proposed > schemes, and several major performance issues. Reviewer 1 > finds that in its current form, the paper is not properly > written and the presentation and organization of this paper > should be significantly improved before a formal review. > Reviewer 2 mentions that a better comparison with various > implementations under the ¡°rigorous¡± models is required. > Reviewer 3 points out there are many typos and many > sentences whose meanings are unclear. In addition, Reviewer > 3 also offered some suggestions as to how to improve the > presentation of the manuscript. > > Based on my own reading of this paper and considering the > reviewers' comments, I find that the paper is not suitable > for publication in its current form. However, I would like > to offer you an opportunity to revise the manuscript. Before > you upload the revised manuscript, please consider a > proofreading by a native English speaker. > > It is recommended that you resubmit your manuscript, WITHIN > TWO MONTHS from the date of this email, as revised in > accordance with the comments. If you fail to do so, your > paper will be considered withdrawn from the review process. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
267Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϾ©¹¤Òµ´óѧ0817»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
285»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á£¨081700£©
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
08¹¤¿Æ 320×Ü·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
±¾ÈË¿¼085602 »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì ר˶
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬Í¶³öÒ»¸öÔ±à¼ÕâÑù¸ø»Ø£¬»¹ÒªÖØÍ¶Ã´£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ͶIEEE transaction on Wireless Communications£¬Ð´Ì«¶ÌÁË£¬»á²»»á±¯¾ç
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ï¿´¿´£¬ÕâÊDz»ÊÇÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶Ñ½...
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
IEEE signal processing letters ¸ÄºóÖØÍ¶£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ͶµÄIEEE SPL±»¾ÜÁË,1/2Éó¸åÈËstronly suggestÖØÍ¶,ÊÇ¿ÍÌ×,»¹ÊÇÕæµÄ¸ÃÖØÍ¶?
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
AMR¼ìË÷ËٶȱäÂýÁË£¬²»»áºÍIEEEÒ»Ñù£¬ÓÖ±¯¾çÁ˰É?
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
IEEE Trans Signal Processing ÖØÍ¶»¹ÊǸÄͶ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÎÞ½ð±Ò¡£¡£¿ÞÇó°ïÖú¡£¡£¡°±»¾Ü£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÊÇÖØÍ¶»¹ÊǸÄͶ£¿¡±
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
IEEE Ͷ¸åÊDz»ÊǶ¼Êǵ¥À¸°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
allen_baobao
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 102 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 10396
- É¢½ð: 3367
- ºì»¨: 31
- Ìû×Ó: 3801
- ÔÚÏß: 3664.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1175925
- ×¢²á: 2010-12-23
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨

6Â¥2012-07-14 15:09:36
wanghuicug
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1679.9
- É¢½ð: 1357
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 541
- ÔÚÏß: 245.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 818894
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»ú¿ÆÑ§µÄ»ù´¡ÀíÂÛ
2Â¥2012-07-14 10:12:07
woodymusic
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 272.1
- Ìû×Ó: 178
- ÔÚÏß: 70Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1313869
- ×¢²á: 2011-06-02
- רҵ: µ¼º½¡¢ÖƵ¼Óë´«¸Ð¼¼Êõ
3Â¥2012-07-14 10:26:08
sesame_oil
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 4518 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 2.947
- ½ð±Ò: 35328.4
- É¢½ð: 385
- ºì»¨: 188
- ɳ·¢: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 18585
- ÔÚÏß: 536.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1188734
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-12
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å

4Â¥2012-07-14 10:41:02













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20