24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1027  |  回复: 4

missingxu

银虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 帮忙看看审稿人意见是什么意思

Reviewer #1:
- Originality - Is the article sufficiently novel and interesting to warrant publication?   The manuscript concerns an attractive area about formation of ohmic contacts to C face of SiC. Unfortunately it does not contain superfluous results.
- Methodology - Does the author accurately explain how the data was collected? Is there sufficient data that the experiment can be reproduced?
Yes
- Results and discussion- is this strong, does it show the meaning of the results?    Weak
- Conclusion - Does the conclusion tell how the work resulted in an advance?   +/-- Does this paper need significant revision in order to be published?  Yes

The description of the results is not comprehensive. A full study requires engaging more characterization techniques. Introduction could be more interestingly written with a bit more criticism.

English should be corrected.  


conclusion 对应的 “+/-”是什么意思啊?
“more characterization techniques”是要求做其他的表征吗?我只用了XRD表明产生了新相
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

十送红军

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2012-07-14 15:45:52
missingxu: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢了,O(∩_∩)O哈哈~ 2012-07-16 20:16:37
你的论文问题比较大,跟老师或师兄师姐好好讨论讨论吧。
从实验到论文写作上都要大改。
2楼2012-07-13 16:05:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hls85915

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

科研工具版——沙漠之胡

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2012-07-14 15:46:02
missingxu: 金币+1, 有帮助, 谢谢 2012-07-16 20:16:55
就是要求大修,好好修改。。。。
哈哈
3楼2012-07-14 15:08:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
missingxu: 金币+1, 有帮助, 谢谢 2012-07-16 20:17:25
给你机会了,好好修改吧。祝好运
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
4楼2012-07-14 15:46:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tourismjoe

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
missingxu: 金币+1, 有帮助, 谢谢 2012-07-16 20:17:34
好像是问题有点大,不过既然给了你机会就要好好把握哟,可以请教下师兄、师姐,还有导师
5楼2012-07-14 22:59:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 missingxu 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见