24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1119  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdf

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 不太明白返回意见中关于统计方法的意见

各位大侠,小弟投稿Animal,现在终于返修了,审稿意见中关于统计方法的意见有些不太明白,希望各位大侠帮忙看看。
原来的分析方法我是用的单因素多重比较,用means±sd。审稿人的意见如下:On the statistics section: for analysis of variance you need to check homogeneity of variance of the model residuals(这个是什么意思?该如何解决). Please check and mention in the text. I was also wondering why you did not analyze the experiment as a 2 x 3 factorial design + added control. Would provide a much stronger analysis as it does not lean strongly on a post-hoc multiple comparison test(这句也不太明白). You actually have 2 levels of A (.5 and 2) and 3 levels of B (0, 300, 600). You could also test interactions between these factors. Then compare selected treatments with control using predesigned hypothesis testing (contrast procedure in SAS). It would also facilitate interpretation. Sorry I did not pick it up in the first version.
该如何应对?请各位大侠指点。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不应该进行简单的单因素方差分析
4楼2012-07-08 20:26:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wdf 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见