24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1962  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

[交流] 投tetraheron,审稿人意见如下:大家帮忙参详下 已有7人参与

有几个问题,为什么现在不打分了?还有就是到底是大修还是小修啊?多谢各位了!

reviewer 1
In the manuscript, Huang et al. reported an convenient synthetic route to 2,7-bromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one (3), which can be utilized as a very useful electron-withdrawing building block. Also the absorption and emission properties of a series of D-A molecules based on 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one units was studied, exhibiting solvent-dependent fluorescence and low energy bandgaps. Interestingly, a specific 2D self-assembly behaviors have been also demonstrated. The writing is well-organized. It can be publishable in Tetrahedron. Minor point: In references, the journal name should be properly abbreviated.


reviewer 2
The paper of Li and co-workers describes a facile and effective method to
synthesize 2,7-dibromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one 3 involving tandem oxidation and rearrangement reactions. Compared to the previously reported synthesis route, the reaction condition of new approach is relatively mild and the yield gets improved. Furthermore, 3 D-A compounds were prepared based on compound 3, and their spectroscopic properties and self-assembly was investigated. Thus it is potentially publishable in Tetrahedron as a full article, but certain issues must be addressed through major revision. The following is the list of a few problematic points that need to be corrected in revision:
1-    Careful spell check is definitely needed since there are several
errors in spelling of organic solvents, such as in Page 3, "toluene", and
"dicholoroform".
2-    In the discussion of Figure2 page 2, the authors stated "In contrast
to compounds 5 and 7, the absorption maximum wavelength of compound 6 was red-shifted approximately 40 nm, presumably because of the improved -conjugation that resulted from embedding two additional thiophene rings into the donor branches."  However, it is apparently unjustified to compare compounds 6 and 7, since their donor parts are essentially the same. Thus a significant revision is needed here.
3-    In the discussion of emission spectra page 3, the authors concluded
that the emission spectra of three compounds in solid film are very weak due to the effects of heavy atoms. Here, which kind of heavy atoms do the authors refer? A further discussion is needed before this conclusion.

reviewer 3
The study of structure comparison, physical properties, and self-assembly in three D-A molecules provide an interesting insight on structure-function relationship of novel conjugated small molecules. However, the manuscript is full of typos and ambiguous elucidation, which needs to be thoroughly revised by a native English speaker to be understandable. The following points are all shown as highlight in the pdf.
1)   The grammatical errors need to be fixed.
2)   The large amount of misspelling of words is really not appropriate
in a scientific paper. The authors should be more responsible for their
writing.
3)   What is the reason that the authors use different solvent for
reduction and oxidation during CV measurement?
4)   Several sentences are not understandable.
5)   Among the experimental section, the authors mentioned "appropriate temperature". This is not a description that should appear in a scientific paper.
回复此楼
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

henry835

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
11楼: Originally posted by 水飘零 at 2012-07-02 21:42:02
关键是第三个审稿人说我的里面充满了模糊不清的描述,我去,这没具体目标,不好改啊...

有时当局者迷,旁观者清。找同事、同学或前辈帮看看。
Reviewer
15楼2012-07-02 23:16:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
三人普遍反映楼主写作需要雕琢,单词,语法写错啥的不应该...
人的烦恼就是记性太好,如果可以把所有事都忘掉,以后每一日都是个新开始,你说多好。
2楼2012-07-02 20:38:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhang2003174

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
呵呵,感觉上是两个小修录用,一个大修,应该是没有问题了,恭喜楼主了。
3楼2012-07-02 20:41:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ldbz

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
审稿人的意见说的很清楚了。有哪里不明白的吗
4楼2012-07-02 20:44:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国社科申报系统有变化 +3 kynobel 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-29 21:57 by 余韵清
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-29 21:33 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-29 21:22 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +5 德尚中行 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-29 18:10 by manplx
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +9 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 9/450 2026-08-29 14:41 by hustersqt
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-29 14:03 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 13:51 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +3 349506619 2026-08-28 3/150 2026-08-29 10:49 by 木风9012
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-29 09:59 by jklily
[教师之家] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-29 09:26 by G6APbkg8SA6w
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
信息提示
请填处理意见