| 查看: 3300 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
14832672金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
Journal of sound and vibration 投稿
|
||
| Journal of sound and vibration 投稿10天变成under review， 再过4天Required Reviews Completed，这什么情况? |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 审稿人 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有16人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有13人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有121人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 刚被据了，心情不好
已经有26人回复
- 近十年机械工程学科美国学者SCI发文居前100位期刊
已经有34人回复
- 声学类 投 EPL 合适吗？
已经有6人回复
- 投稿一周了还是submitted to journal，没分配稿件编号
已经有5人回复
- 振动类SCI期刊投稿求助
已经有11人回复
- 文章被拒审稿意见建议改投
已经有5人回复
- 求帮忙下载一篇英文论文
已经有2人回复
- Elsevier SD(ScienceDirect)收录期刊-工程领域
已经有11人回复
- elsevier投稿求助（以解决多谢LX虫友）
已经有31人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2012-06-28 15:21:54
zhang2003174
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 444 (硕士)
- 金币: 13183.4
- 散金: 2130
- 红花: 37
- 帖子: 3690
- 在线: 606小时
- 虫号: 1858387
- 注册: 2012-06-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
2楼2012-06-28 14:56:25
41010212
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2990.1
- 散金: 60
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 1405
- 在线: 567小时
- 虫号: 319853
- 注册: 2007-03-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机械动力学
3楼2012-06-28 15:04:02
14832672
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1365.3
- 散金: 2
- 帖子: 168
- 在线: 48.5小时
- 虫号: 888529
- 注册: 2009-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机械动力学
|
谢谢各位朋友的回复，今早来看，被拒稿了。意见如下： Reviewers' comments: The work is based on Brennan's and his collegues work, but in order to get QZS, you did not use two oblique springs. The authors derived the stiffness-displacement characteristics and discussed it. As pointed out by the reviewer, the presentation can be more concise and the manuscript could be very much shortened. As a result, it may not contain sufficient materials for a full paper. Therefore, your manuscript is rejected but you are encouraged to further develop your work which could be an interesting contribution. Reviewer #1: This paper presents an ingenious device for implementing very low dynamic stiffness via a nonlinear mechanism. However, the authors seem to me to give an unnecessarily complicated account of how it works. The attached file gives an energy-based description which more or less says everything that is needed, perhaps. The mathematics in the paper could be shortened drastically along these lines. The result could be a short communication which would be worthy of publication in JSV. The presentation also needs some tidying up in terms of English language usage, and conforming to the usual styles: for example, references in the text all give the full list of authors' names and initials in a format that is different every time. They should be reduced to standard form. Figures 1 b,c are a bit scruffy: the springs appear to have been sketched roughly by hand rather than drawn neatly. Given a simpler form of the analytic expression for the results, I think the number of figures could be reduced quite a lot. |
6楼2012-07-02 09:05:52
