| ²é¿´: 3052 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
14832672½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Journal of sound and vibration Ͷ¸å
|
| Journal of sound and vibration Ͷ¸å10Ìì±ä³Éunder review£¬ ÔÙ¹ý4ÌìRequired Reviews Completed£¬ÕâʲôÇé¿ö? |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
Éó¸åÈË |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
302Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐʦ·¶´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
338Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
342Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0835ѧ˶299Çóµ÷¼Á 08´óÀà¿É½ÓÊÜ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085602µ÷¼Á ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
É격
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
¸Õ±»¾ÝÁË£¬ÐÄÇé²»ºÃ
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
½üÊ®Äê»úе¹¤³Ìѧ¿ÆÃÀ¹úѧÕßSCI·¢ÎľÓǰ100λÆÚ¿¯
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
ÉùѧÀà Ͷ EPL ºÏÊÊÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÒ»ÖÜÁË»¹ÊÇsubmitted to journal£¬Ã»·ÖÅä¸å¼þ±àºÅ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Õñ¶¯ÀàSCIÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ±»¾ÜÉó¸åÒâ¼û½¨Òé¸ÄͶ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çó°ïæÏÂÔØÒ»ÆªÓ¢ÎÄÂÛÎÄ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
Elsevier SD(ScienceDirect)ÊÕ¼ÆÚ¿¯-¹¤³ÌÁìÓò
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
elsevierͶ¸åÇóÖú£¨ÒÔ½â¾ö¶àлLX³æÓÑ£©
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
zhang2003174
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 444 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 13183.4
- É¢½ð: 2130
- ºì»¨: 37
- Ìû×Ó: 3690
- ÔÚÏß: 606Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1858387
- ×¢²á: 2012-06-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÍøÂç
2Â¥2012-06-28 14:56:25
41010212
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2990.1
- É¢½ð: 60
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 1405
- ÔÚÏß: 566.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 319853
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »úе¶¯Á¦Ñ§
3Â¥2012-06-28 15:04:02
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
4Â¥2012-06-28 15:21:54
|
5Â¥2012-06-29 09:34:03
14832672
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1365.3
- É¢½ð: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 168
- ÔÚÏß: 48.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 888529
- ×¢²á: 2009-10-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »úе¶¯Á¦Ñ§
|
лл¸÷λÅóÓѵĻظ´£¬½ñÔçÀ´¿´£¬±»¾Ü¸åÁË¡£Òâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Reviewers' comments: The work is based on Brennan's and his collegues work, but in order to get QZS, you did not use two oblique springs. The authors derived the stiffness-displacement characteristics and discussed it. As pointed out by the reviewer, the presentation can be more concise and the manuscript could be very much shortened. As a result, it may not contain sufficient materials for a full paper. Therefore, your manuscript is rejected but you are encouraged to further develop your work which could be an interesting contribution. Reviewer #1: This paper presents an ingenious device for implementing very low dynamic stiffness via a nonlinear mechanism. However, the authors seem to me to give an unnecessarily complicated account of how it works. The attached file gives an energy-based description which more or less says everything that is needed, perhaps. The mathematics in the paper could be shortened drastically along these lines. The result could be a short communication which would be worthy of publication in JSV. The presentation also needs some tidying up in terms of English language usage, and conforming to the usual styles: for example, references in the text all give the full list of authors' names and initials in a format that is different every time. They should be reduced to standard form. Figures 1 b,c are a bit scruffy: the springs appear to have been sketched roughly by hand rather than drawn neatly. Given a simpler form of the analytic expression for the results, I think the number of figures could be reduced quite a lot. |
6Â¥2012-07-02 09:05:52
kory2010
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 619.1
- É¢½ð: 201
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 239
- ÔÚÏß: 143.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2444397
- ×¢²á: 2013-05-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »ú¹¹Ñ§Óë»úÆ÷ÈË

7Â¥2016-02-25 21:16:21














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥