| 查看: 2359 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lizhijie09捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请大家帮忙看看这个审查意见是什么意思啊
|
||
|
请大家帮我看一下这个审查意见是什么意思？“addressing the referees' concerns”是什么意思啊？投这个刊希望大吗，有经验的给指点一下啊。已经提交过一次修改稿了，但好像还有问题，还有希望吗？ Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxxxxx" which you submitted to xxxxxxx, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in Materials and Manufacturing Processes. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. PLEASE NOTE: When submitting your resubmission, please address all reviewer comments in a separate file and upload it along with the rest of your manuscript files. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Materials and Manufacturing Processes, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. I look forward to a resubmission. Sincerely, Dr xxxxxxxx Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: ONLY single keywords MUST be used references must be expanded with NO abbreviations if you do not provide a detailed reply to the administrative comments we cannot send your manuscript for technical review  [ Last edited by lizhijie09 on 2012-6-27 at 15:56 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
287求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
325求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
343求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂推荐 材料 304
已经有4人回复
-
316求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
351求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
349求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料学硕333求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
342求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
调剂求收留
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 急，请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见，困惑.......
已经有13人回复
- 帮忙看看这个审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮忙看看我的国青评审意见
已经有15人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看评审意见，上会没有，修改后明年有希望吗
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮忙看看基金委委务会议审批是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮忙看看俺的评审意见，给些建议吧
已经有8人回复
- 大家帮看看技术审查后的意见，具体是什么意思。
已经有3人回复
- 电子与信息学报的一个外审意见,大家帮忙看看+第二个外审意见已回
已经有33人回复
- 锁帖
已经有33人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮忙看下第四个格式审查意见是什么意思？
已经有13人回复
- 大家帮忙看看审稿栏中，这句话是什么意思
已经有3人回复
xiajimu
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1703 (讲师)
- 金币: 12573.5
- 散金: 9739
- 红花: 35
- 帖子: 5940
- 在线: 2164.6小时
- 虫号: 288243
- 注册: 2006-10-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化学工程及工业化学
8楼2012-06-28 04:11:02
timegardener
银虫 (正式写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 91 (初中生)
- 金币: 1102.6
- 散金: 1000
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 457
- 在线: 168.4小时
- 虫号: 1452780
- 注册: 2011-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
2楼2012-06-27 18:36:30
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
3楼2012-06-27 19:57:14
zhang2003174
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 444 (硕士)
- 金币: 13183.4
- 散金: 2130
- 红花: 37
- 帖子: 3690
- 在线: 606小时
- 虫号: 1858387
- 注册: 2012-06-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
avast2009: 金币+3, 鼓励交流 2012-06-28 08:37:27
lizhijie09: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢指点 2012-06-29 19:05:44
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
avast2009: 金币+3, 鼓励交流 2012-06-28 08:37:27
lizhijie09: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢指点 2012-06-29 19:05:44
|
However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns. 文章有亮点，可以修改后重新投稿。 addressing the referees' concerns. 要求你要针对审稿人的意见逐条修改。 |
4楼2012-06-27 19:59:22
