24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3064)
>虫友互识 (235)
>导师招生 (197)
>文献求助 (188)
>论文投稿 (69)
>硕博家园 (56)
>休闲灌水 (55)
>公派出国 (49)
>考博 (42)
>招聘信息布告栏 (37)
>论文道贺祈福 (32)
>催化 (29)
>教师之家 (27)
>找工作 (27)
>考研 (25)
>博后之家 (23)

返回列表

本帖产生 1 个翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qhd511

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

翻译EPI: 1
应助: 324 (大学生)
金币: 6915.3
散金: 226
红花: 12
帖子: 1922
在线: 390.1小时
虫号: 1079710
注册: 2010-08-22
性别: GG
专业: 环境分析化学

[求助] 继续请英语地道的专家帮忙润色，谢谢！

Twelve portions of samples above mentioned were added into 50mL colorimetric tubes, 10.0g of each sample was weighed. Then they were divided into 6 groups. The final series of concentrations of the samples were 0, 5.0, 10.0,20.0, 50.0, and 100.0 mg kg-1(2 parallel per sample). At the same time, the same method above was also employed with S. The results for the determination of O in these samples were listed in Table 1. From Table 1 we concluded that a good agreement between U and S when the content of sample was below 20.0 mg kg-1, however, the results of U were superior to those of S when the contents were above 20.0 mg kg-1.

分别取10.00g 上述样品12份，分6组加入到50mL比色管中，加入O标准溶液使测定的O浓度分别为0、5.0、10.0、20.0、50.0、100.0mg/kg（每组2份平行）；同样取10.00g 上述样品12份，分6组采用S方法提取，加标方法同U方法。
两种方法比对数据见表1。测定结果表明，当测定结果≤20.0mg/kg时，两种提取方法均能满足分析要求，无明显差异；当测定结果＞20.0mg/kg时，U方法测定的结果优于S方法。

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

精品翻译集锦

» 猜你喜欢

求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？已经有8人回复
Cas 72-43-5需要30g，定制合成，能接单的留言已经有8人回复
北京211副教授，35岁，想重新出发，去国外做博后，怎么样？已经有8人回复
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！已经有5人回复
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了已经有25人回复
2026年机械制造与材料应用国际会议（ICMMMA 2026）已经有3人回复
自荐读博已经有3人回复
不自信的我已经有5人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球已经有8人回复

1楼 2012-06-09 21:19:49

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

qhd511

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

翻译EPI: 1
应助: 324 (大学生)
金币: 6915.3
散金: 226
红花: 12
帖子: 1922
在线: 390.1小时
虫号: 1079710
注册: 2010-08-22
性别: GG
专业: 环境分析化学

请楼上的朋友帮忙修改，下面是详细的内容，需要修改的是英语，中文仅供参考，深表感谢！
Twelve portions of simulation soil standard samples above mentioned were added into 50mL colorimetric tubes, 5.0000g of each sample was weighed. Then they were divided into 6 groups. The final series of concentrations of the simulation soil standard samples were 0, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 mg kg-1(2 parallel per sample). At the same time, the same method above was also employed with Soxhlet extraction. The results for the determination of petroleum oils in these simulation soil standard samples were listed in Table 1. From Table 1 we concluded that a good agreement between ultrasonic solvent extraction and Soxhlet extraction when the content of simulation soil standard sample was below 25.0 mg kg-1, however, the results of ultrasonic solvent extraction were superior to those of Soxhlet extraction when the contents were above 25.0 mg kg-1.

取上述模拟标准土壤样品5.00g 共12份，分成6组分别加入到50mL比色管中。然后加入石油类标准溶液，使测定的模拟标准土壤样品中石油类浓度分别为0、5.0、10.0、25.0、50.0、100.0mg/kg（每组做2份平行）；另取同样的质量和分数的样品，分成6组采用索氏提取法，加标方法与超声波萃取法相同。两种方法比对数据见表1。测定结果表明，当测定结果≤25mg/kg时，两种提取方法均能满足分析要求，无明显差异；当测定结果＞25mg/kg时，超声波萃取法测定的结果优于索氏提取法。