| 查看: 694 | 回复: 1 | |||
zhiguobuaa银虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
Renewed Standards for Rapid Communications in Physical Review A 已有1人参与
|
|
五月一号PRA编辑部专门撰文明确地强调Rapid Communications的定位: "Rapid Communications are meant to be the equivalent of Letters, but are intended for the specialized audience of the Physical Review rather than the general audience of Physical Review Letters”, 要求审稿人" a rejection for PRL should not be followed by a recommendation to publish the paper as a Rapid Communication unless it meets rigorous standards of impact on the field." 之前，PRB开辟专栏（http://prb.aps.org/rapids）介绍Rapid Communications,也强调"publication of short papers presenting highly original and significant material." 看样子，APS想要提升Rapid Communications的影响力了，将其定位为“约等于”PRL。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
虫们啊，快告诉我Work-in-Progress Track是神马东西吧
已经有8人回复
- Why not join in the YY English communication~
已经有20人回复
- god blesses me for doctoral examination
已经有10人回复
- 求一篇英文文献Small Number of Hidden Units for ELM with Two-Stage Linear Model
已经有4人回复
- Impressed raining for the whole afternoon in this city
已经有4人回复
- 【软件】COBRA: Matlab codes for background subtraction in spectroscopy
已经有17人回复
- chemical communications 四天后被Publishing Editor 给拒了，要argue吗，崩溃！
已经有21人回复
- I wish you the best in your search for a professional position
已经有2人回复
- awaiting referee selection 变为 awaiting Editor-in-Chief 是不是要悲剧了啊
已经有12人回复
- Grass Girl, Would You Please Come In & Show Us Your Kindness ?
已经有25人回复
- Rapid communications in mass spectrometry杂志的Proof一般多长时间送达？
已经有24人回复
- Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 投稿
已经有4人回复
 |
2楼2012-05-12 10:54:51
