|
|
[交流]
Renewed Standards for Rapid Communications in Physical Review A 已有1人参与
五月一号PRA编辑部专门撰文明确地强调Rapid Communications的定位: "Rapid Communications are meant to be the equivalent of Letters, but are intended for the specialized audience of the Physical Review rather than the general audience of Physical Review Letters”, 要求审稿人" a rejection for PRL should not be followed by a recommendation to publish the paper as a Rapid Communication unless it meets rigorous standards of impact on the field."
之前，PRB开辟专栏（http://prb.aps.org/rapids）介绍Rapid Communications,也强调"publication of short papers presenting highly original and significant material."
看样子，APS想要提升Rapid Communications的影响力了，将其定位为“约等于”PRL。 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
27博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
厉娜
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有15人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有15人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
|
回复此楼
