| ²é¿´: 558 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
jjxiang¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
·´Ó¦Ò»¶Î»°¡¤¡¤¡¤Ã»¿´¶®£¡£¡
|
||
|
To assess fully the correspondence of this signal with the imine carbon, we performed a cross-polarization contact time variation experiment, which shows different trends of increasing intensity for carbons with different protonation states. With the exception of the imine, all of the resonance signals between 120 and 160 ppm corresponded to quaternary carbons (aromatic and amide); therefore, we expected the intensity of the imine carbon signal to be significantly different from those of the rest of the signals in the same range |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
¾«Æ··Ò뼯½õ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏѧ˶333Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÕ08µ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶ÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085602 289·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
274Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÕÐ08¿¼Êýѧ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´

8814402
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 509
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.381
- ½ð±Ò: 12916.1
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 4183
- ÔÚÏß: 357.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1184404
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-06
- רҵ: Ò©ÎïѧÆäËû¿ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
jjxiang: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2012-05-05 08:09:34
jjxiang: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2012-05-05 08:09:34
|
To assess fully the correspondence of this signal with the imine carbon, we performed a cross-polarization contact time variation experiment, which shows different trends of increasing intensity for carbons with different protonation states. ÎªÈ«ÃæÆÀ¼ÛÐźÅÓëÑǰ·Ì¼¼äµÄͨÐÅ£¬ÎÒÃǽøÐÐÁ˽»²æ¼«»¯½Ó´¥Ê±¼ä±ä»¯ÊÔÑ飬ÏÔʾ²»Í¬ÖÊ×Ó»¯×´Ì¬µÄ̼ǿ¶ÈÔö¼ÓµÄÇ÷ÊÆ²»Í¬ |
2Â¥2012-05-04 16:54:58
8814402
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 509
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.381
- ½ð±Ò: 12916.1
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 4183
- ÔÚÏß: 357.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1184404
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-06
- רҵ: Ò©ÎïѧÆäËû¿ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
| With the exception of the imine, all of the resonance signals between 120 and 160 ppm corresponded to quaternary carbons (aromatic and amide); ³ýÁËÑǰ·£¬ËùÓÐ120ºÍ160ppm¼äµÄ¹²ÕñÐźžùÓ뼾̼Ô×Ó£¨·¼ÏãµÄ»ò°±»ù̼£©Ïà¹Ø£»therefore, we expected the intensity of the imine carbon signal to be significantly different from those of the rest of the signals in the same rangeÒò¶ø£¬ÎÒÃÇÔ¤ÆÚ£¬Ñǰ·Ì¼Ô×ÓÐźÅÇ¿¶È½«ÏÔÖøÓбðÓÚͬһ·¶Î§Ä򵀮äËüÐźš£ |
3Â¥2012-05-04 16:59:47
8814402
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 509
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.381
- ½ð±Ò: 12916.1
- É¢½ð: 47
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 4183
- ÔÚÏß: 357.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1184404
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-06
- רҵ: Ò©ÎïѧÆäËû¿ÆÑ§ÎÊÌâ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
To assess fully the correspondence of this signal with the imine carbon, we performed a cross-polarization contact time variation experiment, which shows different trends of increasing intensity for carbons with different protonation states. ÎªÈ«ÃæÆÀ¼ÛÐźÅÓëÑǰ·Ì¼¼äµÄͨÐÅ£¬ÎÒÃǽøÐÐÁ˽»²æ¼«»¯½Ó´¥Ê±¼ä±ä»¯ÊÔÑ飬ÏÔʾ²»Í¬ÖÊ×Ó»¯×´Ì¬µÄ̼ǿ¶ÈÔö¼ÓµÄÇ÷ÊÆ²»Í¬ ÕâÀͨÐÅ¡±´íÁË£¬Ó¦Îª¡°Ïà¹ØÐÔ¡±£»¡°Ì¼Ç¿¶È¡±¸ÄΪ¡°Ì¼Ô×ÓÐźÅÇ¿¶È¡± |
4Â¥2012-05-04 17:01:27













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥