| 查看: 6923 | 回复: 6 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
huaxianzi659新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
MMTA 一审意见如下，请高手帮看看二审录用几率大吗？一般二审被拒的概率多大呢？
|
|||
|
意见如下，焦急等待。。。 Dear Ms. LI: Please accept our apologies for the delay in returning a recommendation on your manuscript. Our review committee has advised us that the material in your manuscript contains publishable information that may be of interest to readers and suitable for publication as a Technical Publication in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. However, they have also pointed out possible omissions, errors, unclear statements, or other difficulties. Hence, a considerable mandatory revision has been recommended. This revision is described by the enclosed comments of the review committee, which are intended to be a constructive input to the review process. When you submit your revised manuscript, your letter of transmittal should indicate explicitly how you have responded to the reviewer comments. Please note that your revised manuscript may be returned to the review committee for their comments and reappraisal. Thank you for your interest in publishing your work in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN BELOW THIS LETTER TO SEE COMMENTS OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key Reader (Referencing comments): The references are up-to-date and appropriate. Key Reader (Points In Favor): The paper is well written and represents an solid mathematical analysis of the processs. New insight into the physical process is gained including --- Key Reader (Points Detracting): The modeling and mathematical analysis is not verified or validated using actual process data. Question: How are is the reader to know if the analytic model reflects the results achieved in practice? This point needs to be addressed by the authors. Key Reader (Importance of Contribution): As mentioned above, the modeling provides new insight into the physical process. Reviewer #1 (Referencing comments): The references are up-to-date and appropriate. Reviewer #1 (Points In Favor): The paper presents an excellent mathematical analysis of ---. It is useful that --- were included in the analysis. Reviewer #1 (Points Detracting): The paper is generally well written but there are some corrections in grammar which should be made before the paper is accepted for publication. Reviewer #1 (Importance of Contribution): This work gives a good presentation of the mathematical models needed to describe ---. Reviewer #2 (Referencing comments): The references are mostly up-to-date and appropriate. Reviewer #2 (Points In Favor): This paper is well written with a clearly logic approach. This paper covers all parametric studies. Reviewer #2 (Points Detracting): Although it presented all essential prediction with respect to each parameter, this paper needs to show preliminary experimental data to verify their model. Reviewer #2 (Importance of Contribution): The main contribution of this paper would be the determination of optimum parameters to obtain desired shapes/geometries with best material properties. Reviewer #2 (Remarks to the Author): This paper is accptable with minor changes - to show an example of the comparison between prediction and experiments. 不知道这样的意见，录用的几率有多大呢? 修改稿已经提交了，等待中。。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 学习资源 | 博士相关 |
» 猜你喜欢
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有12人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
入职后第一次管课题组的专利缴费，对账才发现官费比别人多掏了一倍
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 弱弱问一下，高水平一般刷人概率为多少，在拿到教授的PASS以后
已经有13人回复
- Environ Monit Assess 审稿周期一般要多久啊
已经有9人回复
- 晶体指标化不好，一般怎么改进才能得到好的晶体，新手求教啊
已经有5人回复
- 一审被拒，打算重投，改个题目，要给编辑说明吗
已经有4人回复
- 论文被拒后 如何申诉？
已经有16人回复
- 有誰知道這個二�?要多久嗎? OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
已经有12人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 被reject后 再resubmit 严格按着审稿人的意见修改的 会有多大几率接收呢
已经有7人回复
- 纳米合成的文章，论文二审被拒，大家帮忙推荐个杂志吧
已经有29人回复
- Talanta 二审被拒，为什么？
已经有11人回复
- 二审 require reviews completed 三个多月 昨天被拒了
已经有27人回复
- 论文由于revision list写的不好二审而被拒，请教补救措施
已经有9人回复
- 《制冷学报》二审快两个月了都没消息，要催一下编辑吗？
已经有11人回复
- 一个小小的呼吁（关于二审被拒）
已经有46人回复
- 二审时间比一审时间还长，希望大吗
已经有18人回复
- 主题已被删除
已经有32人回复
- 青基二审被淘汰，贴评审意见帮忙分析，明年再战
已经有9人回复
huaxianzi659
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 34.2小时
- 虫号: 1422964
- 注册: 2011-09-29
- 专业: 金属材料的制备科学与跨学
6楼2012-05-03 10:13:27
yanwuliaorao
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 1462 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.088
- 金币: 15622.2
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 54
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 15373
- 在线: 1011.7小时
- 虫号: 1749011
- 注册: 2012-04-10
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
2楼2012-04-28 10:18:42
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
3楼2012-04-28 10:20:11
mpcctv
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
Peter
- 应助: 1650 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 1.314
- 金币: 9743.6
- 散金: 5975
- 红花: 43
- 沙发: 111
- 帖子: 6607
- 在线: 720.7小时
- 虫号: 736508
- 注册: 2009-03-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
- 管辖: 签证指南
4楼2012-04-28 10:24:17
