应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 原创经验 » MMTA 一审意见如下，请高手帮看看二审录用几率大吗？一般二审被拒的概率多大呢？
71/1返回列表
查看: 6208  |  回复: 6
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

huaxianzi659

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] MMTA 一审意见如下，请高手帮看看二审录用几率大吗？一般二审被拒的概率多大呢？

意见如下，焦急等待。。。
Dear Ms. LI:

Please accept our apologies for the delay in returning a recommendation on your manuscript.

Our review committee has advised us that the material in your manuscript contains publishable information that may be of interest to readers and suitable for publication as a Technical Publication in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. However, they have also pointed out possible omissions, errors, unclear statements, or other difficulties. Hence, a considerable mandatory revision has been recommended. This revision is described by the enclosed comments of the review committee, which are intended to be a constructive input to the review process.

When you submit your revised manuscript, your letter of transmittal should indicate explicitly how you have responded to the reviewer comments. Please note that your revised manuscript may be returned to the review committee for their comments and reappraisal.

Thank you for your interest in publishing your work in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN BELOW THIS LETTER TO SEE COMMENTS OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key Reader (Referencing comments):

The references are up-to-date and appropriate.

Key Reader (Points In Favor):

The paper is well written and represents an solid mathematical analysis of the processs. New insight into the physical process is gained including ---

Key Reader (Points Detracting):

The modeling and mathematical analysis is not verified or validated using actual process data. Question: How are is the reader to know if the analytic model reflects the results achieved in practice? This point needs to be addressed by the authors.

Key Reader (Importance of Contribution):

As mentioned above, the modeling provides new insight into the physical process.


Reviewer #1 (Referencing comments):

The references are up-to-date and appropriate.

Reviewer #1 (Points In Favor):

The paper presents an excellent mathematical analysis of ---. It is useful that --- were included in the analysis.

Reviewer #1 (Points Detracting):

The paper is generally well written but there are some corrections in grammar which should be made before the paper is accepted for publication.

Reviewer #1 (Importance of Contribution):

This work gives a good presentation of the mathematical models needed to describe ---.


Reviewer #2 (Referencing comments):

The references are mostly up-to-date and appropriate.

Reviewer #2 (Points In Favor):

This paper is well written with a clearly logic approach.
This paper covers all parametric studies.

Reviewer #2 (Points Detracting):

Although it presented all essential prediction with respect to each parameter, this paper needs to show preliminary experimental data to verify their model.


Reviewer #2 (Importance of Contribution):

The main contribution of this paper would be the determination of optimum parameters to obtain desired shapes/geometries with best material properties.

Reviewer #2 (Remarks to the Author):

This paper is accptable with minor changes - to show an example of the comparison between prediction and experiments.

不知道这样的意见，录用的几率有多大呢? 修改稿已经提交了，等待中。。。。。。
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

学习资源 博士相关

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-04-28 10:10:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yanwuliaorao

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
huaxianzi659: 金币+1 2012-04-28 10:25:34
整体评价是相当不错的，唯一的比较负面的意见是你的模型和数学分析没有经过实际过程数据的验证，但这个不是硬伤，也不是致命伤。
所以你只要按审稿人的意见好好修改，基本是录用了。恭喜楼主！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
阳光总在风雨后！
2楼2012-04-28 10:18:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (文坛精英)
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见
赞一下
3楼2012-04-28 10:20:11
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

mpcctv

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

Peter

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
按照他们的要求认真修改 中的几率还是很大的
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
successhasmanyfathers,butfailureisanorphan.ifyoufailtoplan,thenyouplantofail
4楼2012-04-28 10:24:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huaxianzi659

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by yanwuliaorao at 2012-04-28 10:18:42:
整体评价是相当不错的，唯一的比较负面的意见是你的模型和数学分析没有经过实际过程数据的验证，但这个不是硬伤，也不是致命伤。
所以你只要按审稿人的意见好好修改，基本是录用了。恭喜楼主！

哦，希望能像你说的这样，借你吉言。我和导师改了二十天。希望能让审稿人满意
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2012-04-28 10:26:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huaxianzi659

新虫 (初入文坛)
10天左右就出结果了，这个杂志效率好高啊
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2012-05-03 10:13:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
这个审稿多久呀？？？
要版免费么？？？？？
谢谢~~~~~~~~~~~
赞一下 回复此楼
某某某，有朝一日，一定要你跪下给我添脚~~~
7楼2012-07-17 17:35:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 huaxianzi659 的主题更新
71/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭