24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6288  |  回复: 6
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

huaxianzi659

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] MMTA 一审意见如下,请高手帮看看二审录用几率大吗?一般二审被拒的概率多大呢?

意见如下,焦急等待。。。
Dear Ms. LI:

Please accept our apologies for the delay in returning a recommendation on your manuscript.

Our review committee has advised us that the material in your manuscript contains publishable information that may be of interest to readers and suitable for publication as a Technical Publication in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. However, they have also pointed out possible omissions, errors, unclear statements, or other difficulties. Hence, a considerable mandatory revision has been recommended. This revision is described by the enclosed comments of the review committee, which are intended to be a constructive input to the review process.

When you submit your revised manuscript, your letter of transmittal should indicate explicitly how you have responded to the reviewer comments. Please note that your revised manuscript may be returned to the review committee for their comments and reappraisal.

Thank you for your interest in publishing your work in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN BELOW THIS LETTER TO SEE COMMENTS OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key Reader (Referencing comments):

The references are up-to-date and appropriate.

Key Reader (Points In Favor):

The paper is well written and represents an solid mathematical analysis of the processs. New insight into the physical process is gained including ---

Key Reader (Points Detracting):

The modeling and mathematical analysis is not verified or validated using actual process data. Question: How are is the reader to know if the analytic model reflects the results achieved in practice? This point needs to be addressed by the authors.

Key Reader (Importance of Contribution):

As mentioned above, the modeling provides new insight into the physical process.


Reviewer #1 (Referencing comments):

The references are up-to-date and appropriate.

Reviewer #1 (Points In Favor):

The paper presents an excellent mathematical analysis of ---. It is useful that --- were included in the analysis.

Reviewer #1 (Points Detracting):

The paper is generally well written but there are some corrections in grammar which should be made before the paper is accepted for publication.

Reviewer #1 (Importance of Contribution):

This work gives a good presentation of the mathematical models needed to describe ---.


Reviewer #2 (Referencing comments):

The references are mostly up-to-date and appropriate.

Reviewer #2 (Points In Favor):

This paper is well written with a clearly logic approach.
This paper covers all parametric studies.

Reviewer #2 (Points Detracting):

Although it presented all essential prediction with respect to each parameter, this paper needs to show preliminary experimental data to verify their model.


Reviewer #2 (Importance of Contribution):

The main contribution of this paper would be the determination of optimum parameters to obtain desired shapes/geometries with best material properties.

Reviewer #2 (Remarks to the Author):

This paper is accptable with minor changes - to show an example of the comparison between prediction and experiments.

不知道这样的意见,录用的几率有多大呢? 修改稿已经提交了,等待中。。。。。。
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

学习资源 博士相关

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (文坛精英)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2012-04-28 10:20:11
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
查看全部 7 个回答

yanwuliaorao

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
huaxianzi659: 金币+1 2012-04-28 10:25:34
整体评价是相当不错的,唯一的比较负面的意见是你的模型和数学分析没有经过实际过程数据的验证,但这个不是硬伤,也不是致命伤。
所以你只要按审稿人的意见好好修改,基本是录用了。恭喜楼主!
阳光总在风雨后!
2楼2012-04-28 10:18:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mpcctv

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

Peter

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
按照他们的要求认真修改 中的几率还是很大的
successhasmanyfathers,butfailureisanorphan.ifyoufailtoplan,thenyouplantofail
4楼2012-04-28 10:24:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huaxianzi659

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by yanwuliaorao at 2012-04-28 10:18:42:
整体评价是相当不错的,唯一的比较负面的意见是你的模型和数学分析没有经过实际过程数据的验证,但这个不是硬伤,也不是致命伤。
所以你只要按审稿人的意见好好修改,基本是录用了。恭喜楼主!

哦,希望能像你说的这样,借你吉言。我和导师改了二十天。希望能让审稿人满意
5楼2012-04-28 10:26:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 欢迎采矿、地质、岩土、计算机、人工智能等专业的同学报考 +3 pin8023 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-03-02 00:24 by 花YOU重开日
[考研] 279求调剂 +3 dua1 2026-03-01 4/200 2026-03-02 00:23 by 大脸蛋子
[基金申请] 本子写完了,给DS兄弟看了,得了92分 +3 Doma 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-02 00:00 by jnzsy
[考研] 一志愿郑大材料学硕298分,求调剂 +5 wsl111 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 23:45 by 暮雨星晴
[考研] 0856材料与化工,270求调剂 +6 YXCT 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 23:21 by 向上的胖东
[考研] 江苏省农科院招调剂1名 +3 Qwertyuop 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 23:18 by aaadim
[基金申请] 成果系统访问量大,请一小时后再尝试。---NSFC啥时候好哦,已经两天这样了 +4 NSFC2026我来了 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 22:37 by 铁门栓
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +10 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 12/600 2026-03-01 22:10 by 海嵙Y
[考研] 274求调剂 +3 cgyzqwn 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 21:24 by cgyzqwn
[考研] 0805总分292,求调剂 +7 幻想之殇 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-01 21:22 by 公瑾逍遥
[考研] 306分材料调剂 +4 chuanzhu川烛 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 19:48 by 无际的草原
[考研] 298求调剂 +6 axyz3 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 19:00 by 18137688336
[考研] 化工专硕348,一志愿985求调剂 +5 弗格个 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 17:25 by sunny81
[考研] 290求调剂 +9 材料专硕调剂; 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 17:21 by sunny81
[考研] 311求调剂 +6 亭亭亭01 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 15:41 by 324616
[考研] 寻找调剂 +4 LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 10:56 by sunny81
[基金申请] 面上模板改不了页边距吧? +5 ieewxg 2026-02-25 6/300 2026-03-01 00:10 by addressing
[考研] 307求调剂 +4 73372112 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 00:04 by ll247
[考研] 304求调剂 +3 52hz~~ 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-03-01 00:00 by 52hz~~
[考研] 276求调剂 +3 路lyh123 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 19:45 by 路lyh123
信息提示
请填处理意见