24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3418  |  回复: 18
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助!

有投过European Journal of Operational Research的虫友吗?向您请教一个问题?
我11年初向European Journal of Operational Research投了一篇稿子,11年末编辑回信拒了,回信如下:
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.

经过修改后于12年初重投给该杂志,最近编辑回信又拒了,回信如下:
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.


通过审稿意见可以看出审稿人还是原先的两个审稿人,两个人都要求修改。
我想请教一下有过European Journal of Operational Research投稿经验的朋友,上面的两次回信一模一样,是不是都是European Journal of Operational Research编辑们拒稿的模版啊。编辑其实只是客套一下,事实上并不喜欢你的文章,并不准备接受你的文章。如果是这种情况的话,我就不再重投这个杂志了。

还是编辑就是这样,拒了让你修改重投,再拒了再让你修改重投,直至接收,中间没有大修或小修这种状态。如果是这种情况的话,那我就继续修改再重投这个杂志了。

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-14 at 14:16 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

相同的审稿人没问题,给你找相同的审稿人就是为了缩短审稿周期。问题是人家的意见是不是不同,如果不同就要综合考虑两次的审稿意见,好好修改文章。看得出,人家还是认为你的文章还是有亮点的,所以得好好改。相当于重写。
天下兴亡,我的责任!
6楼2012-04-11 09:43:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhzimi_2007: 金币+2 2012-04-14 14:12:52
你看看专家的审稿意见是不是两次都一样啊?如果不一样,说明编辑的信只是个模版,如果审稿人的审稿意见一样,那有可能是发错了。
天下兴亡,我的责任!
2楼2012-04-11 09:36:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不同期刊有点不一样,但是这个应该是个模板回复,应该都还附上其他修改意见吧
独上高楼。。。
3楼2012-04-11 09:38:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by seapass at 2012-04-11 09:38:00:
不同期刊有点不一样,但是这个应该是个模板回复,应该都还附上其他修改意见吧

有具体的审稿意见,两次好像都是相同的审稿人。
4楼2012-04-11 09:40:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 19:35 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-30 19:26 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 17:47 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考研] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 10/500 2026-08-30 17:33 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 14:03 by GkCVyODlx4mR
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +5 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 8/400 2026-08-30 12:03 by l0VvVHGBGRLv
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 06:10 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +4 349506619 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 22:41 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见