24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1759.3
散金: 50
帖子: 3631
在线: 703.6小时
虫号: 450803
注册: 2007-11-04
专业: 应用数学方法

[求助] 投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助！

有投过European Journal of Operational Research的虫友吗？向您请教一个问题？
我11年初向European Journal of Operational Research投了一篇稿子，11年末编辑回信拒了，回信如下：
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.

经过修改后于12年初重投给该杂志，最近编辑回信又拒了，回信如下：
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.

通过审稿意见可以看出审稿人还是原先的两个审稿人，两个人都要求修改。
我想请教一下有过European Journal of Operational Research投稿经验的朋友，上面的两次回信一模一样，是不是都是European Journal of Operational Research编辑们拒稿的模版啊。编辑其实只是客套一下，事实上并不喜欢你的文章，并不准备接受你的文章。如果是这种情况的话，我就不再重投这个杂志了。

还是编辑就是这样，拒了让你修改重投，再拒了再让你修改重投，直至接收，中间没有大修或小修这种状态。如果是这种情况的话，那我就继续修改再重投这个杂志了。

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-14 at 14:16 ]

回复此楼