24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3414  |  回复: 18
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助!

有投过European Journal of Operational Research的虫友吗?向您请教一个问题?
我11年初向European Journal of Operational Research投了一篇稿子,11年末编辑回信拒了,回信如下:
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.

经过修改后于12年初重投给该杂志,最近编辑回信又拒了,回信如下:
I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration.

The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready.

From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally
accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not
mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and
re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret.

In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the
referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the
"major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time.


通过审稿意见可以看出审稿人还是原先的两个审稿人,两个人都要求修改。
我想请教一下有过European Journal of Operational Research投稿经验的朋友,上面的两次回信一模一样,是不是都是European Journal of Operational Research编辑们拒稿的模版啊。编辑其实只是客套一下,事实上并不喜欢你的文章,并不准备接受你的文章。如果是这种情况的话,我就不再重投这个杂志了。

还是编辑就是这样,拒了让你修改重投,再拒了再让你修改重投,直至接收,中间没有大修或小修这种状态。如果是这种情况的话,那我就继续修改再重投这个杂志了。

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-14 at 14:16 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

我看了你的审稿意见,人家的意见挺多的,你得照着人家的意见好好改。
天下兴亡,我的责任!
10楼2012-04-11 09:57:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhzimi_2007: 金币+2 2012-04-14 14:12:52
你看看专家的审稿意见是不是两次都一样啊?如果不一样,说明编辑的信只是个模版,如果审稿人的审稿意见一样,那有可能是发错了。
天下兴亡,我的责任!
2楼2012-04-11 09:36:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不同期刊有点不一样,但是这个应该是个模板回复,应该都还附上其他修改意见吧
独上高楼。。。
3楼2012-04-11 09:38:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by seapass at 2012-04-11 09:38:00:
不同期刊有点不一样,但是这个应该是个模板回复,应该都还附上其他修改意见吧

有具体的审稿意见,两次好像都是相同的审稿人。
4楼2012-04-11 09:40:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 02:40 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-30 02:18 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 02:09 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-30 01:58 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +5 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:58 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:49 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:45 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:36 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-30 00:59 by winsaint
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +5 gdd2018 2026-08-28 10/500 2026-08-29 14:10 by Jacob678
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
信息提示
请填处理意见