24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zwxiaowei

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 14 (小学生)
金币: 3829.4
帖子: 814
在线: 679.7小时
虫号: 566477

[交流] 大家帮看看，这是不是修改重投呀...

25天审稿意见回来。三个审稿人：第一个审稿人总体评价 “This is an interesting study describing a number of experiments regarding ... Presented script needs some attention.” 要求补充一个实验，另给出了很多语言修改意见；第二个审稿人评价“The manuscript includes many issues about the level of English and the scientific novelty... I cannot recommend accepting as a regular paper of the Journal.” 也举例给出了语言修改意见；第三个审稿人评价“ There are some specific areas need to be mended before it is acceptable. ” 对实验没有给出意见，对语言和文章的结构和写作技巧给出了大量意见。
另外编辑也给出了语言修改意见。

最终审稿结果：
I regret to inform you that on the basis of the reports and comments received from the referees we are unable to accept the above-mentioned manuscript for publication in ...in its present form.
The comments of the referees are enclosed for your consideration. We hope the information provided by the referees is helpful to you. However, as suggested by the referees, we would like to encourage you to prepare a new version of your manuscript and to resubmit this to the Journal if you have made a thorough revision and you are confident in convincing the referees. But for that you must do the additional experimental work asked by the reviewers. If this is not done, it is not useful to resubmit : your manuscript will be rejected.
If or when you resubmit please have a detailed list (point to point) of your responses to each item of the review comments, and highlight your revised text in red in the new version of your manuscript.
When you do so, please enter the original Manuscript ID in the appropriate field in the manuscript details page.
If we may be of assistance, please feel free to contact us.
请各位帮看看，主编说可以修改重投，这是一般的模板式回复，还是真的给修改重投的机会呢？本人是个新手，对此不是很明白，请各位帮分析下，谢谢！

回复此楼