24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3250  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

兔八哥8601

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 收到lab on a chip的拒信,可否重投

投稿后一个月收到审稿人的意见,两个审稿人一个意见大修,一个拒绝,最后编辑给了reject的决定。感觉编辑说得比较委婉,我没能搞清楚编辑拒绝的具体原因是什么,是文章本身的创新不够还是我的文章表述得不行?如果是文章表述的问题的话修改后是否可以再投这个杂志呢?这是博士生涯第一篇文章,请大家多指点!附上拒信内容和审稿意见。
Thank you for your recent submission to Lab on a Chip.  We have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below.  After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I regret to inform you that we do not find your current manuscript suitable for publication in Lab on a Chip. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports.
I am sorry not to have better news for you and I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

Yours sincerely,
************
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Referee: 1
Recommendation: major revisions needed
Comments to the Author
The paper describes an approach for ......The described approach is interesting and warrants some form of publication. Nevertheless, there are several major issues which should be addressed by the authors prior to publication.
Q1.2.3.....
Referee: 2
Recommendation: reject
Comments to the Author
In this manuscript, authors presented...... However, this manuscript does not give enough fundamental information and characterization of the device.
Q1.2.3.....
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

好帖子

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

学会学习,更要学会吸收
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 兔八哥8601 at 2012-04-06 14:31:15:
补充一下,审稿人提的意见都是针对文章的实质性内容的,没涉及到语法之类。另外,投稿后的第二天就被送审了(是不是可以认为编辑从一开始看到文章还是感兴趣的?)。之后under review状态持续了差不多30天,然后收 ...

有很多实质性的意见,不算是失败的投稿,好好修改或许冲更好的期刊,我之前也这么做过。成功啦,祝福你!
独上高楼。。。
12楼2012-04-06 18:09:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 兔八哥8601 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见