24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1174  |  回复: 2
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

人工智能

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 英文润色(结果分析部分,一小段)

Here, We analyze the performance of the one-iteration Delphi process qualitatively. Fig. 10 is the final results with and without the Delphi process. We can see that, the results are more dispersive without the Delphi process, reflecting with more uncertainties in the decision process. Without the Delphi process, it is hard to rank A1 and A3, which are very close to each other. While after the one-iteration Delphi process, the DMers are more convinced that A1 is better than A3. There are all fifteen matrices (3 DMers × 5 matrices each one) both before and after the Delphi process. So, we compare the CIs, which represent the consistency of judgment matrices, between the two stages. We can see from Fig. 11 that, after the one-iteration Delphi process, 13/15 CIs are diminished. So, we guess that the Delphi process can enhance the consistency of DMer’s subjective judgments.

请高手帮我润色一下。
主要是说,没有one-iteration Delphi process,得到的结果更加不确定 ;有one-iteration Delphi process ,结果更稳定,并且一致性有所提高。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Justain

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
人工智能: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2012-04-06 18:53:03
Here, we will analyze qualitatively the performance of the one-iteration Delphi process. Fig. 10 shows the final results with and without the Delphi process. It could be found that the results are more dispersive when without the Delphi process, reflecting more uncertainties in the decision process. Without the Delphi process, it is hard to rank between those similar A1 and A3; while with the one-iteration Delphi process, the DMers are more convinced that A1 is better than A3. There are fifteen matrices together (3 DMers × 5 matrices each) both before and after the Delphi process. So when we compare the CIs, which represent the consistency of judgment matrices between the two stages, it could be found from Fig. 11 that 13/15 CIs are diminished after the one-iteration Delphi process. Therefore, we guess that the Delphi process can enhance the consistency of DMer’s subjective judgments.

原文个别地方有语法错误。
3楼2012-04-06 13:16:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

Luckyman2012

木虫 (知名作家)

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
人工智能: 金币+15, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-04-06 18:52:55
Here, we analyze the performance of the one-iteration Delphi process qualitatively. Fig. 10 shows the final results with and without the Delphi process. It could be found that the results are more dispersive when without the Delphi process, reflecting more uncertainties in the decision process. Without the Delphi process, it is hard to rank between A1 and A3, which are very close to each other. While after the one-iteration Delphi process, the DMers are more convinced that A1 is better than A3. There are fifteen matrices together (3 DMers × 5 matrices each one) both before and after the Delphi process. So we compare the CIs, which represent the consistency of judgment matrices between the two stages. It could be found from Fig. 11 that, after the one-iteration Delphi process, 13/15 CIs are diminished. So, we guess that the Delphi process can enhance the consistency of DMer’s subjective judgments.

原来翻译得已经很不错了。
我修改了几个个别的地方。因为专业不懂,未必准确,仅供参考!
走别人的路,让自己去说吧……
2楼2012-04-05 22:59:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +17 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-09-02 00:19 by xiangy672
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
信息提示
请填处理意见