24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ethan2801

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 41 (小学生)
金币: 2284
帖子: 1098
在线: 423.3小时
虫号: 751767

[交流] 投了一篇angew，帮忙看看

这样的审稿意见，准备修改了重新投回去，请问这样还有机会的吗？三个审稿人两个同意小修接受，一个说新意不够据稿，谢谢

Thank you for your submission of 08.03.2012 and for the above-mentioned manuscript. We read this with interest and asked referees for their opinions.

We agree with the comments made by one of the referees that although your findings are interesting they do not represent a sufficient basis for publication of a communication at the present time. Once you have obtained significant new results that are pertinent to the referees' comments, we would be willing to reassess an appropriately supplemented new manuscript. Please explain then in the accompanying letter which changes you have made (and, more importantly, which not, giving reasons why not).

The new version will be assigned a new registration number and date of receipt in our files and will be sent back to the same referees provided that they are available. If necessary an impartial new referee may be asked for advice.

I hope that you will understand our decision on this matter, and I remain

回复此楼