24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hichancekill

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 421.9
帖子: 174
在线: 115.8小时
虫号: 1368624

[交流] 麻烦大牛看一下我这个major revision该任何修改？

投到finite elements in analysis and design. 快四个月了终于有了审稿意见，是major revision. 审稿人的意见只附了一个，是关于文章创新点的问题（推测其他审稿人的意见是接受，所以就没附上？）。

The review of your paper has been completed, and the comments of the reviewers are given below. In particular, the review given is unable to ascertain the novelty contained in the approach described in the paper. For the paper to be acceptable, this point must be satisfactorily addressed--if you are to to resubmit the paper, it should be extensively edited to clearly highlight the innovations in analysis technique featured in the work.
Accordingly, a thorough revision of this paper is needed, after which I will re-evaluate it for publication, possibly in consultation once more with the reviewers.
----------------------------------------------------
Reviewer #1: The authors attempt to model concrete at meso scale and try to mesh aggregate, mortar, and ITZ. WHile they have succeeded they seem to have used various tools as black boxes and furnish no details of the algorithms in these tools. The tools themselves are not theirs. So it is difficult to acertain their contribution and the associated novelty. Extensive revision needed.
关于这一点我的解释：混凝土细观上由aggregate\mortar和itz组成。现在研究者都能mesh aggregate 和mortar，但是没有人能 mesh ITZ，而ITZ又是非常重要的。我的文章的创新之处在于在利用现有的有限元建模软件mesh aggregate 和mortar的基础上, 利用自编的程序成功mesh了ITZ。不过在文章里对自编的程序只进行了原理的介绍和实例说明，没有附上具体的代码。

不知道大牛们有什么具体的建议没有？在哪些方面进行 thorough revision?
谢谢各位！

回复此楼