24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2722  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ltyan

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 大牛帮忙看看PRL的Edotor意见已有11人参与

一篇文章投到PRL,等了一个月,下面是Editor的回复:


Dear Dr. xxxx,

The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees.

A critique drawn from the reports appears below. On this basis, we
judge that the paper is not appropriate for Physical Review Letters,
but might be suitable for publication in another journal, possibly with
some revision. Therefore, we recommend that you submit your manuscript
elsewhere.

If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
resubmit to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please
include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all
recommendations and criticisms.

Yours sincerely,
xxxxxxx

三个审稿人,
A的意见摘要:“xxxxxx. If the authors are willing to thoroughly cite this literature and present a convincing argument that what they have done adds to the extensive picture that has already been developed into exactly this sort of system then I might possibly be willing to reconsider my decision.”

B提了一大堆问题,说是改完再审

C肯听了这篇文章的结果和方法,但是建议投more special journal.

本人感觉这些问题都可以回答掉,于是想argue一下。由于缺乏这方面的经验,请大牛给些建议吧,先谢谢了!
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
argue希望不大,前两个审稿人针对你文章本身的问题而发,但是第三个审稿人是针对你的内容而言,所以说
12楼2012-04-28 15:43:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ltyan 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见