¸÷λ³æÓÑ£º
±¾ÈË×î½üͶÁËÆªcrystal growth & design£¬¸Õ¸Õ·µ»ØÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÈçÏ£º
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish after minor revision.
Comments:
- equation numbers 1 to 5 are missing
- page 7 line 21 it is not "NAIR" but "Rodriguez-Hornedo"
- the sentece in front of eqation 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 an 11 should end with a ":"
Additional Questions:
Originality: Good
Technical Quality: Fair
Clarity of Presentation: Good
Importance to Field: Good
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish after minor revision.
Comments:
Overall this paper is easily followed, and develops the arguments in a logical way. However this referee feels that the theory of the approach would benefit from being in a separate section with three parts solubility, complexation, XXX, then application to XXX data, all of which linked to the appendix. This would then allow the result session to be more easily read by a more general reader ship. With regard the IR what step were taken to deconvolute overlapping bands as the level of broading would be high.
If these two issues are dealt with then in this referee¡¯s view this paper would add to the previous published work in this area, by highlighting the issue of using XXXXXXX.
Additional Questions:
Originality: Good
Technical Quality: Fair
Clarity of Presentation: Fair
Importance to Field: Good
ÇëÎÊÕâÑùСÐÞ±»½ÓÊܵÄÏ£Íû´óСÔõÑù£¿ÁíÍâСÐÞºóµÄÐ޸ĸåÊÇ·µ»ØÉó¸åÈËÄÇÀïÔÙÉó»¹ÊÇÖ±½Ó±à¼¿´¿´¾ÍÐÐÁË£¿Ê®·Ö¸Ðл´ó¼Ò£¡ |