²é¿´: 6136  |  »Ø¸´: 15
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

lufuguang

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] ÇóÖú£¬¹ØÓÚÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½ÓëìʵĹØÏµ£¬ÏÂÃæÊÇÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÒâ¼û£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÁË

As the kinetic data are fitted well by pseudo-second-order model, it can be said the adsorption mechanism is due to chemisorption. However the value of enthalpy (¦¤H) (table 3£¬¦¤H=-2.3KJ.mol-1) indicates that it is due to physisorption? Would the author please explain it?
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

HONEY÷±¦±¦

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

ÒýÓûØÌû:
12Â¥: Originally posted by nancyhc at 2015-05-11 12:09:58
ÇëÎÊÒ»ÏÂÄú×îºóÊÇÔõô»Ø´ðÕâ¸öÎÊÌâµÄ£¿ÎÒÒ²Óöµ½ÁËͬÑùµÄÎÊÌ⣿Çó½Ì

ÄãºÃ ÎÊÒ»ÏÂÄãµÄ »¯Ñ§Îü¸½ ºÍÎïÀíÎü¸½ ŪÃ÷°×ÁËÂð
×ß×ßͣͣ
13Â¥2015-10-30 17:19:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ lufuguang µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û