| 查看: 1254 | 回复: 3 | |||
jeffezheng铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
投稿求助：审稿2让补充实验，但编辑还给出一些修改意见，其目的是？
|
|
编辑来信，是不是意味着没有按reviewer2的意见补充实验（需要很大的工作量，完全可以是另一篇更为好的文章），就只有杯具了...不过，值得斟酌的是，编辑还给出一些修改意见，其目的是？该撤稿呢，还是。。。？请各位大侠提供些参考意见。非常感谢！ Editor’sComments to Authors: One of the reviewers still believes that additional experimentation andanalysis is needed in order to make the work an original contribution to theliterature. The English in your paper needs to be improved. Energy & Fuels is publishedin English. Please note that we have many readers who are not native speakersof English. Therefore, the language in the articles must be clear, in order forall readers to understand it. If you know of someone who is fluent in English,you could have this person review your manuscript. You might also use anediting service. Here are some links to English Language Editing Services: http://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/tools/language_editing.html You can also access this from the log in page on ACS Paragon Plus by clickingon the Information for Authors link. You will then be presented with a menu ofchoices, one of which is the English Language Editing Services. Note that youdo not have to log into to the site to access this information. Your manuscript must adhere to ACS format, especially references. In the text,references should be cited as superscripted numbers, no brackets. In thereference list, the format of the references should adhere to ACS format. Inthe attached file you can see examples of the format of the references. Reviewer:1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: As indicated in the first round of its review, this paper contributes to thebody of knowledge in this important area. Authors have contributed more to theclarity of the paper in its second edition. This paper should be published asis. Thanks. Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Good Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Excellent Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Do not publish. Comments: This work can be considered as a new submission after detailed surfacecharacterization experiments or XAFS analysis, and multicomponent tests areconducted. Authors should show and discuss evidences that can support theproposed reaction mechanism of Hg on the TAC. Unfortunately this paper does notprovide new results to the community without the discussion of multicomponent testsor characterization experiments. I would recommend this manuscript to berejected. For future submission the following issues should be clarified in themanuscript. Why was water vapor not added to the baseline gases? Althoughauthors demonstrated the addition of water vapor in Figure 1, water compositionis not specified in Table 1. How does TAC perform in the presence of watervapor? I would recommend repeating experiments with the addition of water vaporto the baseline gas. Can authors present the breakthrough curve of BL+SO2 experiment after addingwater vapor to the baseline? Water vapor can specifically change the effect ofSO2 on Hg adsorption. SO2 is expected to react with water on the activatedcarbon forming sulfate compounds, which are found to poison the active sites onthe activated carbon required for the adsorption of Hg. Authors should conductmore experiments and provide evidences to understand the effect of SO2. Howdoes SO2 affect Hg adsorption in the presence of HCl, NO and NO2? Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Fair |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
366求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料工程085601，270求调剂
已经有37人回复
-
279学硕食品专业求调剂院校
已经有18人回复
-
290调剂生物0860
已经有31人回复
-
一志愿085802 323分求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
277求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
322求调剂，08工科
已经有4人回复
-
材料工程281还有调剂机会吗
已经有30人回复
-
化学070300 求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
化工学硕294分，求导师收留
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 编辑让我按照其中一个审稿人意见修改，是不是要忽略另一个审稿人啊
已经有6人回复
- JCA审稿意见返回，编辑要求很严厉，语言的问题，想找一个公司帮忙改，大家推荐下
已经有12人回复
- 修改后重审时，编辑给审稿人的时间还是2个月吗？
已经有5人回复
- 修改稿件时, 对审稿人的一条意见不明白, 现求助帮忙. 急!!!
已经有5人回复
- 论文被拒，但编辑说按审稿人的意见修改后再重新提交还是有可能会接受
已经有25人回复
- 求助：文章再次修改（小修）， List of change和给编辑审稿人的信没有改
已经有6人回复
- 审稿人没提意见，编辑提修改意见的minior revision
已经有20人回复
- 急急急！！！求助各位虫友，如何回答审稿人补充实验的问题
已经有28人回复
- 求助，审稿人是让我把论文中的数据交给编辑部挂到网上去吗？
已经有8人回复
- 求助: 理论工作审稿人要求实验数据
已经有8人回复
- 深夜求助，审稿人修改意见都是内容上的讨论，response还用不用具体标注修改的小句子？
已经有6人回复
- 求助，第一次投稿，审稿人的意见，是退稿的意思，还是有修改价值的意思呀
已经有6人回复
- 一个审稿意见让修改，编辑会不会再给其他的呢
已经有49人回复
- 论文修改已经申请延后2个月了，但实验还没有补充完，怎么办？
已经有31人回复
jeffezheng
铁虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 788.7
- 帖子: 37
- 在线: 14.9小时
- 虫号: 458352
- 注册: 2007-11-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
2楼2011-12-24 20:28:05
ahelix
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 32 (小学生)
- 金币: 1299.3
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 210
- 在线: 222.3小时
- 虫号: 1415553
- 注册: 2011-09-24
- 专业: 免疫相关疾病诊疗新技术
3楼2011-12-24 21:41:42
jeffezheng
铁虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 788.7
- 帖子: 37
- 在线: 14.9小时
- 虫号: 458352
- 注册: 2007-11-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
4楼2011-12-24 21:57:43
