24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fuelcell67

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 7
帖子: 1
在线: 5分钟
虫号: 1531346
注册: 2011-12-10

[交流] 请高人鉴别 “大化所” 的这两篇文章算不算一稿多投已有28人参与

最近学习燃料电池方面的知识，检索到这两篇文章
Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401与International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862

惊人的发现这两篇文章的大部分图是一摸一样的，注意不是相似，是相同，而且投稿日期及其接近
Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401
Received 10 January 2006; received in revised form 8 May 2006; accepted 12 May 2006
Available online 18 July 2006

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862
Received 17 January 2006; received in revised form 10 April 2006; accepted 19 May 2006
Available online 27 July 2006

大家鉴别一下，希望我理解的是错的，没有仔细的读全文，仅是从图表来看，下面是相同图的对比，注意是一模一样，不是相似：

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.1 vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.1

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.2 vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.2

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.3(a) vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.7

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.3(a) vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.3(a)

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.4(a) vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.4

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.4(b) vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.5

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.5 vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.9

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.6 vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.10

Electrochimica Acta 52 (2006) 394–401Fig.8 vs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006) 1855 – 1862 Fig.11

在International Journal of Hydrogen Energy这篇文章中除了Fig3(b)和Fig8在Electrochimica Acta这篇文章中没有找到外，其余的9张图与Electrochimica Acta这篇文章中的一模一样，即使一篇是通讯文章，一篇是全文，也不能有如此高的相似度吧，况且还不是这样，两篇均是全文，这是神马情况，请高手鉴别

[ Last edited by fuelcell67 on 2011-12-10 at 02:38 ]

回复此楼