| 查看: 629 | 回复: 2 | ||
[求助]
投elsevier，现在让revise,最后接受的可能性大不？
|
| 有投过elsevier期刊的虫友能否介绍一下自己的写Response Letter的经验，多谢了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
311求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
高分子化学与物理调剂
已经有4人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
博士自荐
已经有3人回复
-
求环氧树脂研发1名
已经有11人回复
-
博士推荐
已经有5人回复
-
0856材料求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
265分求调剂不调专业和学校有行学上就
已经有6人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 有关elsevier 的投稿问题
已经有8人回复
- 文章已经接受，但是Elsevier数据库编辑要我改变表的格式，这个怎么办？
已经有11人回复
- 请问大家投elsevier旗下杂志一般修回多久能有回复啊？
已经有9人回复
- 历经4次投稿之后elsevier杂志终于接受
已经有24人回复
- Elsevier的期刊，revise and resubmit意思是修改重投？
已经有13人回复
- 投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有可能送审吗？
已经有14人回复
- 投了 Elsevier的一个3以上的杂志，under review近4个月了，还没有消息
已经有8人回复
- Elsevier投稿，build PDF的步骤后总是不显示已上传的文件
已经有19人回复
- 第一次投Elsevier期刊，技术审查居然没有提及语言问题
已经有18人回复
- SOS @@@@@急！Elsevier投稿时生成的PDF文件下载不了，Forbidden！？
已经有29人回复
- 投ELsevier，国人的英语就那么蹩脚吗！
已经有10人回复
dlyan
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6409.3
- 散金: 4788
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 9340
- 在线: 543.9小时
- 虫号: 614836
- 注册: 2008-09-28
- 专业: 数学物理
2楼2011-12-07 12:54:34
menghonghu
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 48 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.01
- 金币: 3401.9
- 散金: 369
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 795
- 在线: 145小时
- 虫号: 960852
- 注册: 2010-03-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物进化生物学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★
baberict(金币+20): thanks 2011-12-07 15:40:23
avast2009(金币+3): 鼓励交流 2011-12-07 18:14:38
baberict(金币+20): thanks 2011-12-07 15:40:23
avast2009(金币+3): 鼓励交流 2011-12-07 18:14:38
|
好好修改，机会很大…… Dear Prof. M.S.J. Simmonds, We’d like to thank you for giving us an opportunity to resubmit the paper, and also thank the referees for careful and valuable views to our manuscript. The nice suggestion and correction from the referees are entirely accepted in revised manuscript. And a revised manuscript is resubmitted. In order to your convenient checking, we offer revised manuscript with modified traces showing in revised manuscript. Here we resubmit a new version of our manuscript “Phylogeography of Lagochilus ilicifolius (Lamiaceae) in relation to Quaternary climatic oscillation and aridification in northern China” (No.: BSE-D-11-00207), which has been modified according to the referees’ suggestions point to point as follow. If you have any question about this paper, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Best regards! Sincerely yours, *** Comments: On the whole the manuscript is interesting and well written, however, few corrections are needed: The interpretation of AMOVA fixation indexes is not correct: 1) genetic differentiation among populations within groups is expressed by Fsc (line 13 page 1, line 24 page 7, line 7 page 9) Answer: Thank you for your correct suggestions. We have changed Fst by Fsc and corrected the numerical values in our manuscript. 2) Differentiation among groups is expressed by Fct (line 7 page 9) Answer: Ok, according to your suggestion, “Differentiation among groups is expressed by Fct”, we have deleted “(FST = 0.812)” and retained Fct in text. 3) Fst is the differentiation among populations regardless of groups Answer: We are in full agreement with your point. Fst is regarded as the differentiation among populations in whole manuscript. To this account the Author should attentively consult the Arlequin manual section AMOVA Haplotypic data, several groups of populations. Minor corrections: Line 18 page 7: clade 3-2 included H5, H6 and H7 Answer: Thank you for your careful checking in our text. “clade 3-2 included H5, H6 and H12” in previous manuscript has been corrected by “clade 3-2 included H5, H6 and H7”. Line 9 page 9: may be the Author meant "probably due to low migration". Answer: Yes, you are right, we really means this, so your sentence "probably due to low migration" has accepted in revised manuscript. |
3楼2011-12-07 12:56:01
