²é¿´: 1281  |  »Ø¸´: 3
±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·­ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴

yongbinz

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] 150½ð±Ò¼±Çó¸ßÊÖ°ïæ·­ÒëÒ»¶Î»°£¬ººÒëÓ¢£¬Ð»¾øÈí¼þ·­Ò룡

Òª»ñµÃ¸ßµÄ°þÀëÇ¿¶È£¬³ýÁ˱¡Ä¤ÓëÍ­Á¼ºÃµÄ½çÃæ×÷ÓÃÍ⣬»¹ÐèÒª±¡Ä¤¾ßÓнϸߵÄÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶È¡£AµÄµÍ°þÀëÇ¿¶È²úÉúµÄÔ­ÒòÕýÊÇÒòΪÆä½ÏµÍµÄÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶È¡£´Ë´¦¡°ÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶È¡±Óë¡°À­ÉìÇ¿¶È¡±Á½¸ö¸ÅÄî²¢²»ÍêÈ«Ïàͬ¡£ÒòΪ£¬±¡Ä¤µÄÀ­ÉìÇ¿¶ÈÊDZ¡Ä¤Ñر¡Ä¤Æ½ÃæµÄÆÆ»µÇ¿¶È£¬¶ø°þÀëʱµÄÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶ÈÔòÖ÷ÒªÊÇ´¹Ö±ÓÚ±¡Ä¤Æ½Ãæ·½ÏòµÄÆÆ»µÇ¿¶È¡£Í¨³£µÄ±¡Ä¤¶¼´æÔÚ·Ö×ÓÁ´Ñر¡Ä¤Æ½ÃæµÄ½Ï´ó³Ì¶ÈµÄÈ¡Ïò£¬Òò´Ë£¬Á½¸ö·½ÏòµÄÇ¿¶È²»ÄܵÈͬ£¬ÕâÒ²¾ÍÊÇ˵£¬PI3µÄÀ­ÉìÇ¿¶È´ó²¢²»±íʾ°þÀëʱÆäÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶È¾Í´ó¡£¶ø±¡Ä¤ÓëÍ­²­½çÃæ¸½½ü´æÔڵġ°Èõ±ß½ç²ã¡±»á¼Ó¾ç±¡Ä¤ÔÚÕâÒ»ÇøÓòµÄÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶ÈÓë±¾ÌåÀ­ÉìÇ¿¶ÈµÄ²î±ð¡£Òò´Ë£¬´Ë´¦Ö»ÄÜ˵Ã÷±ß½çÇøÓòµÄÄÚ¾ÛÇ¿¶ÈС¶ø²»ÄÜ˵ÆäÀ­ÉìÇ¿¶ÈС¡£

[ Last edited by yongbinz on 2011-11-25 at 21:13 ]

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

terry_well

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)

Ц°¾½¬ºý¡ª¡ªÂúÄÔ½¬ºý

ÓÅÐã°æÖ÷ÓÅÐã°æÖ÷

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-26 08:09:17
yongbinz(½ð±Ò+80, ·­ÒëEPI+1): 2011-11-26 17:05:39
yongbinz(½ð±Ò+70): 2011-11-28 19:19:28
Inorder to obtain high peel strength, not only a better interfacial bond strength between the thin films and the copper but also a higher cohesive strength of such films are neccessary. The cause of the weak peel strength for A should be its lower cohesive strength. The cohesive strength reffered herein is completely different from the tensile strength which is a kind strength that related to the breaking of surface which is parallel to the surface, whereas cohesive strength is mainly based on the vertical breaking strength of the film. Generally speaking, the molecules of the film are to a greater extent orientated along with the surface direction, which suggests that the strength along with these two directions is different. The higher tensile strength of PI3 thereby can not illustrate its higher cohesive strength.  However, there is weak interfacial layer between the thin films and the copper which might cause higher difference between values of cohesive strength and tensile strength in such region. In short, it could merely indicate that the cohesive strength of boundary region is weak instead of its tensile strength.

½ö¹©²Î¿¼£¬Ï£Íû¶ÔÄãÓÐËù°ïÖú¡£
Ç©Ãû:Ó¢ÎÄÃû¡°Terry¡±,EC°æ×¨Óã»ÖÐÎÄÃû¡°½¬ºý¸ç¡±£¬¹àˮרÓã¬Ð»Ð»ºÏ×÷£¡
2Â¥2011-11-25 22:50:16
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

zyblhyzyx

Òø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-26 08:09:25
To obtain high peel strength, it is necessary to improve both the bonding strength of film/copper at the interface and the cohesive strength of film itself in the boundary layer near the interface. The cause of the weak peel strength for A should be the low cohesive strength of the film. The tensile strength of the  film reflected the fracture strength on in-plane direction, wheras the cohesive strength presented the shear strength on out-of-plane direction.  Therefore, in this article the tensile strength of the film on in-plane orientation was not identical to the cohesive strength of the film on out-plane orientation. Further, the existence of the ¡°weak boundary layer¡± near the interface might cause higher difference between the cohesive strength and tensile strength. In short, thei film with the excellent tensile strength may not necessarily have a high peel strength value.
ÓîÖæÒªÄÜ×é×°¾ÍºÃÁË£¡
3Â¥2011-11-26 00:14:29
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

telepathor

гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-28 12:05:40
To obtain a high peel strength, in addition to a good interface with the copper film role, but also need to have a higher film cohesive strength. A low peel strength causes precisely because of its low cohesive strength. Here "cohesive strength" and "tensile strength" two concepts are not identical. Because the tensile strength of the film along the film plane of the film breaking strength, and peel strength when the cohesion of the film is mainly in the plane perpendicular to the direction of the breaking strength. Usually the molecular chain of the film there is a greater degree along the film plane orientation, therefore, can not be the same strength in both directions, which means that, PI3 does not mean that the tensile strength of its cohesive strength when peeling big. The copper thin film near the interface with the existence of "weak boundary layer" will film in the region increased cohesive strength and bulk tensile strength difference. Therefore, here only shows that the cohesive strength of the boundary region is small and can not say that the tensile strength of small.
4Â¥2011-11-28 11:25:26
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ yongbinz µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á +6 heming3743 2026-03-16 6/300 2026-03-20 18:50 by ¾¡Ë´Ò¢1
[¿¼ÑÐ] 08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á +5 Óû§573181 2026-03-20 5/250 2026-03-20 15:47 by xia_2003
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤ +6 °²È«Éϰ¶£¡ 2026-03-16 6/300 2026-03-20 15:07 by lbsjt
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0817 »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì 299·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á ÓпÆÑо­Àú ÓжþÇøÎÄÕ +21 rare12345 2026-03-18 21/1050 2026-03-20 14:31 by ÎÞи¿É»÷111
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298-Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúũҵ´óѧ-Çóµ÷¼Á +9 ÊÖ»úÓû§ 2026-03-17 9/450 2026-03-20 14:24 by ÎÞи¿É»÷111
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷ÄϽ»Í¨ ר˶ ²ÄÁÏ355 ±¾¿ÆË«·Ç Çóµ÷¼Á +4 Î÷ÄϽ»Í¨×¨²Ä355 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-20 11:39 by »¨¿ª¸»¹óÐÒ¸£ÈËÉ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 081700»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á +3 ¡¾1¡¿ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-19 23:40 by edmund7
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á +10 ÄÝÄÝninicgb 2026-03-15 14/700 2026-03-19 22:59 by ѧԱ8dgXkO
[¿¼ÑÐ] 294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶ +14 ݤÎÉ­ÁÖ 2026-03-18 14/700 2026-03-19 22:38 by ѧԱ8dgXkO
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á +10 Ľº®mio 2026-03-16 10/500 2026-03-19 15:26 by ¶¡¶¡*
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÁÙÔó¾³llllll 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-19 13:59 by houyaoxu
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öк£Ñó²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶330·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +7 С²Ä»¯±¾¿Æ 2026-03-18 7/350 2026-03-19 10:46 by Linda Hu
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÊÕ¸´ÊÔµ÷¼ÁÉú +4 ÓêºóÇïºÉ 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-18 14:16 by elevennnne
[¿¼ÑÐ] 280Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ¹¾ààÏþÏþ 2026-03-18 7/350 2026-03-18 11:25 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] 301Çóµ÷¼Á +4 A_JiXing 2026-03-16 4/200 2026-03-17 17:32 by ruiyingmiao
[˶²©¼ÒÔ°] ºþ±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ ÉúÃü¿ÆÑ§Ó뽡¿µÑ§Ôº-¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶Ê³Æ·/ÉúÎï·½Ïò˶ʿ +3 1ϲ´º8 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-17 17:18 by ber´¨cool×Ó
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0854¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì 359Çóµ÷¼Á ¿É¿çרҵ +3 626776879 2026-03-14 9/450 2026-03-16 17:42 by 626776879
[¿¼ÑÐ] Öпƴó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤319Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÃÏöβÄÁÏ 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-14 20:10 by ms629
[¿¼ÑÐ] 297Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ѧº£Æ¯²´ 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-14 11:51 by ÈÈÇéɳĮ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÕÐÊÕ0805£¨²ÄÁÏ£©µ÷¼Á +3 18595523086 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-14 00:33 by 123%¡¢
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û