| ²é¿´: 476 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹ûгæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
±à¼À´ÐÅû̫¿´¶®£¬Çë°ïÖú´ó¸Å¿´Ò»Ï£¬Ð»Ð»
|
|
ǰÌìͶµÄһƪÂÛÎÄ£¬±à¼À´ÐÅ´ó¸Å˵ÊǼ¼ÊõÄܺĺܸߣ¬Ã»ÊµÓüÛÖµ£¬ÈÃÎÒ½âÊÍһϣ¬µ«ÊÇÀïÃæÓм¸¾ä»°ÊµÔÚ¿´²»¶®£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´×ÜÌåÊÇʲôÒâ˼ µÚÒ»¶ÎºÍ×îºóÒ»¶Î¶¼¶®£¬¾ÍÊǵÚÈý¶ÎµÄһС¶Î£¬Ò»¾ä»°Ã»¿´¶®Ê²Ã´Òâ˼£¬ÕâôͻȻÀ´Ò»¾ä¶¼²»ÖªµÀÔÚ˵ʲô Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in XXXX£¨ÆÚ¿¯Ãû£©. I understand from my preliminary reading that you have devised and tested novel ways of increasing the effectiveness of this means of ameliorating exhaust gas. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address a point that I am certain will concern the reviewers. By my calculation your protocol involves a power density of ~2700 J/L (= 36 W/0.8 L/min), which is two orders of magnitude higher than the figure that I am used to seeing for the technologies that you call laboratory curiosities. Therefore I would ask you to please check my calculation and, if I am correct, then please explain how your protocol could be deployed in a practical manner. I note that I have neglected the energy input for creating the hydrogen peroxide. You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena and that also have some utility. I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. I hope you will continue to consider that XXXXX can provide your work with an attentive audience. Therefore, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±½»´ó²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì×Ü·Ö358Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ר˶304ÕÒµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ïß³ÇÊÐ×îºÃ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϺ½£¬ÊýһӢһѧ˶317Çóµ÷¼Á£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
295Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á325·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
08600ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©-327
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Íâµ¼»ØÐÅÁË£¬ÓÐЩ²»Ã÷°×µÄÊÂÇéÏò´ó¼ÒÇë½ÌÏÂ
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å ÁË£¬±à¼¸øÁ˺ܶàÒâ¼û ´ó¼Ò°ï濴һϰ¡¡£ÓÐЩµØ·½²»Ì«Ã÷°×¡£Ð»Ð»
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
±à¼À´ÐÅû̫¿´¶®£¬Çë°ïÖú´ó¸Å¿´Ò»Ï£¬Ð»Ð»
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
[ÇóÖú]Íâ¹úÔÓÖ¾Éç±à¼À´ÐÅ£¬Óо仰ûÀí½â£¬Ï£ÍûÓÐÈ˰ïÎÒ·ÒëÏÂ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
elsevierµÄ±à¼¶ÔÂÛÎÄÌá³öÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û£¬Ã»¿´¶®£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÁ½Ì죬±à¼À´ÐÅÒªÇ󣬵ÚÒ»¸öÒªÇóûÔõô¿´¶®¡£Çë½ÌÕâÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿µ¼Ê¦×¼±¸¸øÑûÇëÐÅÁË£¬µ«ÊÇÕâ¾ä»°ÎÒû¿´¶®¡£ºÜ¼±£¬ÇóÖú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ú¼ÊÆÚ¿¯ÂÛÎÄͶ¸åÇóÖú-¸ÕͶ¸å¾ÍÊÕµ½±à¼À´ÐÅ£¬ËÄܰïÎÒ¿´Ò»ÏÂÐŵÄÄÚÈÝÊÇʲôÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔõÑù²ÅÄÜ¿´¶®¼ÆËã»úÀàÂÛÎÄÀïÃæµÄÄÇЩÊýѧ¶¨Ò庯ÊýʲôµÄ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¹ØÓÚ½ðÊôÁ¦Ñ§ÐÔÄܸ÷ÏòÒìÐÔµÄÎÊÌ⣬лл
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
£¨10½ð±Ò¸Ðл£©¸ñʽÉó²éµÄ»ØÐÅ£¬Ã»¸ãÃ÷°×ʲôÒâ˼£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã...
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ìý¾õÑÚ±ÎЧӦÀƵÆ×ƽ»¬³Ì¶È¡°º¯ÊýµÄÀí½â
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û(½ð±Ò+5): 2011-11-15 09:30:41
|
±à¼¶ÔÄãµÄÕâ¸ö½á¹ûÖÊÒÉ£¬ÄãÒªÏȽâÊÍ£º your protocol involves a power density of ~2700 J/L (= 36 W/0.8 L/min), which is two orders of magnitude higher than the figure that I am used to seeing for the technologies that you call laboratory curiosities please explain how your protocol could be deployed in a practical manner |
2Â¥2011-11-12 16:51:34














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥