| 查看: 531 | 回复: 1 | ||
半熟的小苹果新虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
编辑来信没太看懂，请帮助大概看一下，谢谢
|
|
前天投的一篇论文，编辑来信大概说是技术能耗很高，没实用价值，让我解释一下，但是里面有几句话实在看不懂，请大家帮我看看总体是什么意思 第一段和最后一段都懂，就是第三段的一小段，一句话没看懂什么意思，这么突然来一句都不知道在说什么 Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in XXXX（期刊名）. I understand from my preliminary reading that you have devised and tested novel ways of increasing the effectiveness of this means of ameliorating exhaust gas. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address a point that I am certain will concern the reviewers. By my calculation your protocol involves a power density of ~2700 J/L (= 36 W/0.8 L/min), which is two orders of magnitude higher than the figure that I am used to seeing for the technologies that you call laboratory curiosities. Therefore I would ask you to please check my calculation and, if I am correct, then please explain how your protocol could be deployed in a practical manner. I note that I have neglected the energy input for creating the hydrogen peroxide. You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena and that also have some utility. I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. I hope you will continue to consider that XXXXX can provide your work with an attentive audience. Therefore, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有21人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有17人回复
-
估计是周四
已经有4人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有18人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有15人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有7人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有16人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 外导回信了，有些不明白的事情向大家请教下
已经有20人回复
- 投稿 了，编辑给了很多意见 大家帮忙看一下啊。有些地方不太明白。谢谢
已经有21人回复
- 编辑来信没太看懂，请帮助大概看一下，谢谢
已经有2人回复
- [求助]外国杂志社编辑来信，有句话没理解，希望有人帮我翻译下
已经有2人回复
- elsevier的编辑对论文提出修改意见，没看懂，请大家帮忙看看
已经有6人回复
- 投稿两天，编辑来信要求，第一个要求没怎么看懂。请教这是什么意思？
已经有17人回复
- 【求助】导师准备给邀请信了，但是这句话我没看懂。很急，求助！
已经有10人回复
- 国际期刊论文投稿求助-刚投稿就收到编辑来信，谁能帮我看一下信的内容是什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 【求助】怎样才能看懂计算机类论文里面的那些数学定义函数什么的
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】关于金属力学性能各向异性的问题，谢谢
已经有15人回复
- （10金币感谢）格式审查的回信，没搞明白什么意思，请高手指点...
已经有9人回复
- 【求助】听觉掩蔽效应里”频谱平滑程度“函数的理解
已经有3人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
【答案】应助回帖
半熟的小苹果(金币+5): 2011-11-15 09:30:41
|
编辑对你的这个结果质疑，你要先解释： your protocol involves a power density of ~2700 J/L (= 36 W/0.8 L/min), which is two orders of magnitude higher than the figure that I am used to seeing for the technologies that you call laboratory curiosities please explain how your protocol could be deployed in a practical manner |
2楼2011-11-12 16:51:34
20