| ²é¿´: 1182 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹ûгæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
±à¼À´ÐÅû̫¿´¶®£¬Çë°ïÖú´ó¸Å¿´Ò»Ï£¬Ð»Ð»
|
||
|
ǰÌìͶµÄһƪÂÛÎÄ£¬±à¼À´ÐÅ´ó¸Å˵ÊǼ¼ÊõÄܺĺܸߣ¬Ã»ÊµÓüÛÖµ£¬ÈÃÎÒ½âÊÍһϣ¬µ«ÊÇÀïÃæÓм¸¾ä»°ÊµÔÚ¿´²»¶®£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´×ÜÌåÊÇʲôÒâ˼ µÚÒ»¶ÎºÍ×îºóÒ»¶Î¶¼¶®£¬¾ÍÊǵÚÈý¶ÎµÄһС¶Î£¬Ò»¾ä»°Ã»¿´¶®Ê²Ã´Òâ˼£¬ÕâôͻȻÀ´Ò»¾ä¶¼²»ÖªµÀÔÚ˵ʲô Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in XXXX£¨ÆÚ¿¯Ãû£©. I understand from my preliminary reading that you have devised and tested novel ways of increasing the effectiveness of this means of ameliorating exhaust gas. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address a point that I am certain will concern the reviewers. By my calculation your protocol involves a power density of ~2700 J/L (= 36 W/0.8 L/min), which is two orders of magnitude higher than the figure that I am used to seeing for the technologies that you call laboratory curiosities. Therefore I would ask you to please check my calculation and, if I am correct, then please explain how your protocol could be deployed in a practical manner. I note that I have neglected the energy input for creating the hydrogen peroxide. You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena and that also have some utility. I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. I hope you will continue to consider that XXXXX can provide your work with an attentive audience. Therefore, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly. |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
¾«Æ··Ò뼯½õ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũ΢ÉúÎ288·Ö£¬ÈýÄêʵÑé¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
269Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268·Ö085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
296Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÉϺ£ÓлúËù£¬Óлú»¯Ñ§356·ÖÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
367Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
086003µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
fjtony163
°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
Ã×Ã×
- ·ÒëEPI: 386
- Ó¦Öú: 361 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 6.876
- ½ð±Ò: 70610.6
- É¢½ð: 36050
- ºì»¨: 222
- ɳ·¢: 616
- Ìû×Ó: 21912
- ÔÚÏß: 3793.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1397876
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-11
- רҵ: ÒÅ´«Ñ§Ñо¿Ð¼¼ÊõÓë·½·¨
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄ·Òë
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-12 18:33:47
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û(½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2011-11-15 09:29:51
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-12 18:33:47
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û(½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2011-11-15 09:29:51
|
ÆäʵµÚÈý¶ÎÄÇÒ»¾ä»°ÊÇ˵£ºÄ㽫»áÀí½âÎÒÃÇÏÖÔÚËù×öµÄÊÇŬÁ¦Èýá¹ûÄܹ»ÔÚÕâ¸ö·Ö×ÓÏÖÏóϽµµÍ³É±¾²¢ÓÐһЩʵÓÃÐÔ¡£bearÔÚÕâ¾ä»°µÄÒâ˼Êǵø¼ÛµÄ£¬thatÊǸöÇ¿µ÷¸±´Ê¡£ Õâ¾ä»°µÄÒâ˼£¬¾ÍÊÇ˵ÎÒÃÇÌá³öÕâЩ½¨ÒéÖ®ºó£¬Äã»áÀí½âÎÒÃǵÄÁ¼¿àÓÃÐĵġ£ |
2Â¥2011-11-12 15:33:19
¹Å¿É¤×
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- ·ÒëEPI: 323
- Ó¦Öú: 91 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 16.835
- ½ð±Ò: 19237.1
- É¢½ð: 40372
- ºì»¨: 275
- ɳ·¢: 183
- Ìû×Ó: 25406
- ÔÚÏß: 1082.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1034379
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò©ÎïÉè¼ÆÓëÒ©ÎïÐÅÏ¢
- ¹ÜϽ: µ¼Ê¦ÕÐÉú
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-13 08:32:18
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û(½ð±Ò+5): 2011-11-15 09:30:19
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-11-13 08:32:18
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û(½ð±Ò+5): 2011-11-15 09:30:19
|
You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena and that also have some utility. ¾ÍÊÇÖ¸Ã÷Ò»ÏÂÑо¿µÄ˼·£¬Í¨Ë×µÄ˵ ¾ÍÊÇ£ºÄãÒªÃ÷°×ÎÒÃǵÄŬÁ¦Ä¿±êÊÇÔÚ·Ö×Ó´¦Àí»úÖÆµÄЧ¹ûÖдøÀ´Ò»¶¨µÄʵÓÃÐÔ underlying molecular phenomena ÔÚ»·¾³´¦Àí·ÏÆø²»ÖªµÀÔõô±í´ï\(^o^)/~ ×Ô¼º×ÁĥһϾÍÐÐ ÁË |

3Â¥2011-11-12 20:23:31













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥