24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2315  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 本人投的natural product research编辑这样回复,修改后有希望中吗?

I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns,  and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in Natural Product Research. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major  revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns.
Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before  a decision is rendered.
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Natural Product Research, your revised manuscript should be  uploaded as soon as possible.I look forward to a resubmission

[ Last edited by ericlee99 on 2011-11-6 at 16:36 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

也想谢谢上面两位但是权限不够,不知道怎么扣金币?麻烦版主代扣了
5楼2011-11-07 09:48:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by shiyuge0228 at 2012-01-05 17:58:09:
楼主,我想问一下你投的时候,补充材料是怎么提交的啊,我提交了两次都说格式不对,但是我阅读它的指导说明又看不出说什么问题,能指导一下吗?谢谢了

对不起,我没有提交补充材料,再问问其他人了。
7楼2012-02-06 14:50:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

送鲜花一朵
引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by wangguokai at 2012-03-05 15:01:54:
我投这个杂志给的也是一样的意见

按照意见改了,现在小修,刚刚把改好的投过去了
9楼2012-03-05 15:53:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

送鲜花一朵
引用回帖:
10楼: Originally posted by wangguokai at 2012-03-06 14:39:25:
他给你什么意见了啊

主要是一些格式上问题。
11楼2012-03-06 16:56:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by wangguokai at 2012-03-06 19:45:15:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
The activties of tested compounds are weak, and the new compound has no novelty.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
I suppose that the "copy and pas ...

我的修改意见
Editor:
NMR spectra (figures 1 and 2) can be accepted only as supplementary materials.

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Well done! Authors did all the due corrections. This article now may be accepted for publication in Natural Product Research.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
13楼2012-03-06 20:44:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ericlee99

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by wangguokai at 2012-03-06 19:45:15:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
The activties of tested compounds are weak, and the new compound has no novelty.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
I suppose that the "copy and pas ...

不知道你测的什么活性?是不是合成方法不新?要是那样的话,是不是从另外得角度解释,虽然不新颖,但是你的东西可以为将来的工作一个做前期探索,然后加到谈论部分,重点强调讨论自己的工作。
14楼2012-03-06 20:51:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ericlee99 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见