应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 原创经验 » 物理化学学报 投稿经历
211/3返回列表123下一页
查看: 3383  |  回复: 20
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

roddick8101

木虫 (小有名气)

腐蚀电化学

[交流] 物理化学学报 投稿经历 已有15人参与

投了物理化学学报，没想到这个杂志这么好！编辑很快很负责！18天外审结束，通知修后录用。没想到的是这次审稿人给我的评价很高，但是我没觉得我写的论文很好。

评审意见1:
The paper is well-organized and varied characterization techniques have been employed to study the corrosion process of tinplate in functional beverage. Therefore, it has made a significant contribution to understand the corrosion behavior of tinplate in functional beverage. There are a few minor issues that could be addressed to improve the understanding of the paper. Following is the list of those issues:
(1) In Experimental Section, the authors mentioned the crystal structure was identified using an X-ray diffractometer (RIGA- KU/DMAX2500, Japan) (in Line 14-15). However, no results or discussions about XRD were presented in the paper. The analysis from XRD helps to further identify the structures of the corrosion products of tin or Fe compounds. Please add the analysis from XRD in the paper.
(2) A typical three-electrode method was used in EIS testing in this paper. Why was a commercial titanium oxide electrode used as the counter electrode (CE)? (in Line 26 in the paper) Titania is a kind of semiconductor, not as good as the conventional Pt electrode.
(3) The surface structure of the tinplate may change with the increasing immersion time. Part of the corrosion product film detached from the surface when the immersion time was after 31 hours and two layers of corrosion product films were observed in Fig. 5(b) in the paper. Do the authors still think only one constant time occurred in the Bode diagram at that moment? If not, the difference should be discussed more in detail.
(4) Why did the authors select an acid functional beverage as the medium? The authors need address the effect of the acid medium on the corrosion mechanism of the tinplate. Thus, the proposed conclusions seem more instructive and convincing.

评审意见2:
不必修改即可刊用
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
<electrochemistrycommunications>,<ActaMetallurgicaSinica
1楼 2011-10-26 00:17:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gy518
2楼2011-10-26 00:26:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luyuan0920

新虫 (正式写手)
霸气外露！
回复此楼
3楼2011-10-26 12:00:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

roddick8101

木虫 (小有名气)

腐蚀电化学
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by luyuan0920 at 2011-10-26 12:00:47:
霸气外露！

呵呵 谢谢  感觉运气好一点
赞一下 回复此楼
<electrochemistrycommunications>,<ActaMetallurgicaSinica
4楼2011-10-26 14:21:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

keen

至尊木虫 (职业作家)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
中文稿子吧？怎么会用英文写意见？
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
5楼2011-10-26 16:05:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

roddick8101

木虫 (小有名气)

腐蚀电化学
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by keen at 2011-10-26 16:05:02:
中文稿子吧？怎么会用英文写意见？

我写的是英文的
回复此楼
<electrochemistrycommunications>,<ActaMetallurgicaSinica
6楼2011-10-26 16:51:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzuaaaxxx
7楼2011-10-26 18:05:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuzhuyaya

木虫 (小有名气)

科研屌丝
楼主想说明什么！
回复此楼
8楼2011-10-26 19:42:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
楼主水平可以，运气也可以
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
9楼2011-10-26 19:47:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xianggui7895

银虫 (小有名气)
羡慕嫉妒恨
回复此楼
10楼2011-10-26 19:49:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 roddick8101 的主题更新
211/3返回列表123下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭