| 查看: 3880 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
roddick8101木虫 (小有名气)
腐蚀电化学
|
[交流]
物理化学学报 投稿经历 已有15人参与
|
||
|
投了物理化学学报，没想到这个杂志这么好！编辑很快很负责！18天外审结束，通知修后录用。没想到的是这次审稿人给我的评价很高，但是我没觉得我写的论文很好。 评审意见1: The paper is well-organized and varied characterization techniques have been employed to study the corrosion process of tinplate in functional beverage. Therefore, it has made a significant contribution to understand the corrosion behavior of tinplate in functional beverage. There are a few minor issues that could be addressed to improve the understanding of the paper. Following is the list of those issues: (1) In Experimental Section, the authors mentioned the crystal structure was identified using an X-ray diffractometer (RIGA- KU/DMAX2500, Japan) (in Line 14-15). However, no results or discussions about XRD were presented in the paper. The analysis from XRD helps to further identify the structures of the corrosion products of tin or Fe compounds. Please add the analysis from XRD in the paper. (2) A typical three-electrode method was used in EIS testing in this paper. Why was a commercial titanium oxide electrode used as the counter electrode (CE)? (in Line 26 in the paper) Titania is a kind of semiconductor, not as good as the conventional Pt electrode. (3) The surface structure of the tinplate may change with the increasing immersion time. Part of the corrosion product film detached from the surface when the immersion time was after 31 hours and two layers of corrosion product films were observed in Fig. 5(b) in the paper. Do the authors still think only one constant time occurred in the Bode diagram at that moment? If not, the difference should be discussed more in detail. (4) Why did the authors select an acid functional beverage as the medium? The authors need address the effect of the acid medium on the corrosion mechanism of the tinplate. Thus, the proposed conclusions seem more instructive and convincing. 评审意见2: 不必修改即可刊用 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研孤儿太难了
已经有9人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有15人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有23人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有22人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有10人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有12人回复
-
言之凿凿，明天官网会通知放榜？
已经有16人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有12人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有20人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有15人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 物理化学学报有稿酬吗
已经有11人回复
- 中文SCI期刊审稿速度如何？
已经有9人回复
- 物理化学学报的版权授权书什么时候提交？要邮寄？
已经有5人回复
- 俺的几次投稿经历，希望对大家有帮助，谢谢！
已经有63人回复
- 问投过物理化学学报的大侠们一个问题
已经有17人回复
- 【有奖活动】~~~生物材料SCI论文写作及期刊投稿经验讨论专题~~~
已经有24人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
9楼2011-10-26 19:47:48
 |
2楼2011-10-26 00:26:46
roddick8101
木虫 (小有名气)
腐蚀电化学
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2470.1
- 散金: 17
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 122
- 在线: 602.9小时
- 虫号: 928118
- 注册: 2009-12-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
4楼2011-10-26 14:21:00
5楼2011-10-26 16:05:02
40