| ²é¿´: 1077 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
yuangaoqianгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
Ͷ¸åºóReconsider for publication£¬Â¼Óõļ¸ÂÊÓжàÉÙ£¿ ÒÑÓÐ3È˲ÎÓë
|
| Ͷ¸åºó£¬±à¼²¿·µ»ØÒâ¼ûreconsider your manuscript for publication pending the incorporation of revisions£¬ÕâÑùµÄ˵·¨ÊÇ´óÐÞ¡¢Ð¡ÐÞ£¬»¹ÊÇÔÀ´²»´òËã¼Ó㬵«¸ù¾ÝÐ޸ĸåÔÙ¿¼ÂǼÓõÄÒâ˼ѽ£¿Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬ÐÄÀïÆßÉϰËϵġ£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ£¬ÉúÎïѧ£¬301·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
081700»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧ˶318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
329Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á£¬×Ü·Ö315£¨Ó¢Ò»£©
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á0856
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´

yangkee
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 21 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 13133.8
- É¢½ð: 5415
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 3242
- ÔÚÏß: 295.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1043579
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-18
- רҵ: Ë®¹¤½á¹¹ºÍ²ÄÁϼ°Ê©¹¤
2Â¥2011-10-13 16:47:22
jiann_li84
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 7986.5
- É¢½ð: 1353
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 2289
- ÔÚÏß: 1032.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 586573
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-15
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
3Â¥2011-10-13 16:49:04
xmaple
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4110.3
- É¢½ð: 100
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 166
- ÔÚÏß: 289.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 429766
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-05
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á¦Ñ§ÖеĻù±¾ÎÊÌâºÍ·½·¨
¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
wxwsmn(½ð±Ò+1): »¶Ó»ØÌû½»Á÷£¡ 2011-10-13 19:11:15
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
wxwsmn(½ð±Ò+1): »¶Ó»ØÌû½»Á÷£¡ 2011-10-13 19:11:15
|
ÈÏÕæÐ޸쬾ÍÓÐÏ£Íû¡£ ÏÂÃæÊÇÎÒ¼¸ÄêǰһƪÎÄÕµıà¼Òâ¼û¡£ÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶ºó¼ÓᣠDear Dr. **: We now have two referee reports on your paper "*****," with * *, submitted to the Journal. I attach them below. While referee 1 recommends eventual publication, referee 2 is considerably more negative, and as I explain below in my Editorial Summary, I believe that on balance there are sufficiently many problems with the paper that I have decided to reject it. I leave open the possibility of you submitting a substantially new paper on the same topic. I do NOT believe that minor revisions and additions to the present paper will suffice. It therefore seems to me that you have two choices: 1) Substantially revise, extend and rewrite, essentially producing a new and more complete paper that will convince both referees that your results are complete and correct. We would treat the revised paper as a new submission, but would ask the same referees to reconsider it. 2) Withdraw the current version from JNLS, make whatever modifications you wish, based on the reports below, and submit elsewhere. Please let me know what you intend to do. |
4Â¥2011-10-13 19:00:18













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥