24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1008  |  回复: 3

yuangaoqian

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 投稿后Reconsider for publication,录用的几率有多少?已有3人参与

投稿后,编辑部返回意见reconsider your manuscript for publication pending the incorporation of revisions,这样的说法是大修、小修,还是原来不打算录用,但根据修改稿再考虑录用的意思呀?请大家帮忙看看,心里七上八下的。
回复此楼
时不我待
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yangkee

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
这是套话,认真修改就是了,祝福
2楼2011-10-13 16:47:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiann_li84

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
反正是让你修改了,好好修改就行了
3楼2011-10-13 16:49:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xmaple

木虫 (小有名气)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
wxwsmn(金币+1): 欢迎回帖交流! 2011-10-13 19:11:15
认真修改,就有希望。
下面是我几年前一篇文章的编辑意见。修改重投后录用。
Dear Dr. **:

We now have two referee reports on your paper "*****," with * *,
submitted to the Journal. I attach them below.

While referee 1 recommends eventual publication, referee 2 is
considerably more negative, and as I explain below in my Editorial
Summary, I believe that on balance there are sufficiently many problems
with the paper that I have decided to reject it. I leave open the
possibility of you submitting a substantially new paper on the same
topic. I do NOT believe that minor revisions and additions to the
present paper will suffice. It therefore seems to me that you have two
choices:

1) Substantially revise, extend and rewrite, essentially producing a new
and more complete paper that will convince both referees that your
results are complete and correct. We would treat the revised paper as a
new submission, but would ask the same referees to reconsider it.

2) Withdraw the current version from JNLS, make whatever modifications
you wish, based on the reports below, and submit elsewhere.

Please let me know what you intend to do.
4楼2011-10-13 19:00:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yuangaoqian 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见