| 查看: 1245 | 回复: 3 | |||
[交流]
投稿后Reconsider for publication，录用的几率有多少？ 已有3人参与
|
| 投稿后，编辑部返回意见reconsider your manuscript for publication pending the incorporation of revisions，这样的说法是大修、小修，还是原来不打算录用，但根据修改稿再考虑录用的意思呀？请大家帮忙看看，心里七上八下的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有50人回复
-
filecode
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
yangkee
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 21 (小学生)
- 金币: 13133.8
- 散金: 5415
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 3242
- 在线: 295.2小时
- 虫号: 1043579
- 注册: 2010-06-18
- 专业: 水工结构和材料及施工
2楼2011-10-13 16:47:22
jiann_li84
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7986.5
- 散金: 1353
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 2289
- 在线: 1032.1小时
- 虫号: 586573
- 注册: 2008-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 控制理论与方法
3楼2011-10-13 16:49:04
xmaple
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4110.3
- 散金: 100
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 166
- 在线: 289.7小时
- 虫号: 429766
- 注册: 2007-08-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 力学中的基本问题和方法
★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
wxwsmn(金币+1): 欢迎回帖交流！ 2011-10-13 19:11:15
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
wxwsmn(金币+1): 欢迎回帖交流！ 2011-10-13 19:11:15
|
认真修改，就有希望。 下面是我几年前一篇文章的编辑意见。修改重投后录用。 Dear Dr. **: We now have two referee reports on your paper "*****," with * *, submitted to the Journal. I attach them below. While referee 1 recommends eventual publication, referee 2 is considerably more negative, and as I explain below in my Editorial Summary, I believe that on balance there are sufficiently many problems with the paper that I have decided to reject it. I leave open the possibility of you submitting a substantially new paper on the same topic. I do NOT believe that minor revisions and additions to the present paper will suffice. It therefore seems to me that you have two choices: 1) Substantially revise, extend and rewrite, essentially producing a new and more complete paper that will convince both referees that your results are complete and correct. We would treat the revised paper as a new submission, but would ask the same referees to reconsider it. 2) Withdraw the current version from JNLS, make whatever modifications you wish, based on the reports below, and submit elsewhere. Please let me know what you intend to do. |
4楼2011-10-13 19:00:18
