| 查看: 873 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
yy08木虫 (著名写手)
PHD
|
[求助]
求翻译
|
||
|
首先感谢大家！要翻译的内容如下： 的确，我们的计算结果和实验值还是有一定的差距，可能是因为计算本身的误差造成的。从以前的文献中也可以发现，GW近似方法对宽带隙半导体的修正结果较好，但是对窄带隙的半导体修正结果不太理想。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 论文翻译精华 |
» 猜你喜欢
3,4-二羟基苯乙酮如何纯化？
已经有5人回复
-
国基评审
已经有10人回复
-
析晶
已经有5人回复
-
国自然面上和省基金B类撒花
已经有22人回复
-
2026-博士申请
已经有4人回复
-
26级硕士毕业生求博导收留
已经有4人回复
-
考研调剂
已经有3人回复
-
急招9月入学博士，要有4级、最晚7月硕士毕业。精密电机驱控课题；学位材料
已经有5人回复
-
又一批高校组建人工智能学院 师资行吗 不是骗人吗
已经有7人回复
-
有没有学校收留
已经有3人回复
|
对比下，1楼的翻译有亮点值得学习 Indeed, there's certain distance between our caculations and experimental results, which may be caused by the caculation eprocess. From previous references, it can be found that GW approximation exhibits a rather good correction to wide band-gap semiconductor but not very well to narrow band-gap semiconductor. |
5楼2011-09-29 18:46:18
sltmac
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 161
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 4.557
- 金币: 30012.8
- 散金: 2687
- 红花: 47
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 5482
- 在线: 633.8小时
- 虫号: 996442
- 注册: 2010-04-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yy08(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:23
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:31:49
爱与雨下(金币+25): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:03
yy08(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:23
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:31:49
爱与雨下(金币+25): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:03
| Certainly，the results we calculated still have a distance when compared with the experimental values, the errors could be generated during the process of calculation. We also found from previous literatures that the approximate method of GW is in good agreement with the wide band gap semiconductors but not very well with the narrow ones. |
2楼2011-09-29 18:28:33
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:42
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:53
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:32:05
爱与雨下(金币+10): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:13
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:42
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:53
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:32:05
爱与雨下(金币+10): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:13
| Indeed, there's certain gap between our caculations and experimental results, which may be caused by the caculation error itself. From previous references, it can be found that GW approximation exhibits a rather good correction to wide band-gap semiconductor. But to narrow band-gap semiconductor, it does not function well. |
3楼2011-09-29 18:40:29
4楼2011-09-29 18:42:32