| 查看: 928 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
yy08木虫 (著名写手)
PHD
|
[求助]
求翻译
|
||
|
首先感谢大家！要翻译的内容如下： 的确，我们的计算结果和实验值还是有一定的差距，可能是因为计算本身的误差造成的。从以前的文献中也可以发现，GW近似方法对宽带隙半导体的修正结果较好，但是对窄带隙的半导体修正结果不太理想。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 论文翻译精华 |
» 猜你喜欢
Suzuki偶联中硼酸酯原料掉下的硼酸酯是否可以自身偶联，生成B2Pin2杂质
已经有3人回复
-
2026年面上项目中了，2A+B, 会评顺利通过
已经有11人回复
-
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有19人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有19人回复
-
刑法学论文投稿求助
已经有5人回复
-
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
已经有3人回复
-
最后一年，祈求好运
已经有3人回复
-
风电环氧领域
已经有3人回复
-
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有4人回复
-
植酸TLC薄层色谱爬板
已经有6人回复
sltmac
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 161
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 4.557
- 金币: 30478.8
- 散金: 2687
- 红花: 47
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 5552
- 在线: 633.8小时
- 虫号: 996442
- 注册: 2010-04-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yy08(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:23
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:31:49
爱与雨下(金币+25): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:03
yy08(金币+5, 翻译EPI+1): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:23
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:31:49
爱与雨下(金币+25): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:03
| Certainly，the results we calculated still have a distance when compared with the experimental values, the errors could be generated during the process of calculation. We also found from previous literatures that the approximate method of GW is in good agreement with the wide band gap semiconductors but not very well with the narrow ones. |
2楼2011-09-29 18:28:33
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:42
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:53
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:32:05
爱与雨下(金币+10): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:13
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:42
yy08(金币+5): 谢谢 2011-09-29 20:30:53
爱与雨下(金币+1): ！~ 2011-09-29 20:32:05
爱与雨下(金币+10): bb代发 2011-10-08 08:42:13
| Indeed, there's certain gap between our caculations and experimental results, which may be caused by the caculation error itself. From previous references, it can be found that GW approximation exhibits a rather good correction to wide band-gap semiconductor. But to narrow band-gap semiconductor, it does not function well. |
3楼2011-09-29 18:40:29
4楼2011-09-29 18:42:32
|
对比下，1楼的翻译有亮点值得学习 Indeed, there's certain distance between our caculations and experimental results, which may be caused by the caculation eprocess. From previous references, it can be found that GW approximation exhibits a rather good correction to wide band-gap semiconductor but not very well to narrow band-gap semiconductor. |
5楼2011-09-29 18:46:18
6楼2011-09-29 22:57:35