| ²é¿´: 1808 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
YANGZL½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡°P¶ÔNP£¨P versus NP, P vs NP£©¡±ÎÊÌâµÄÃèÊö¡¢ÄѶȡ¢¿ÉÄܵĴð°¸
|
|
¡°P¶ÔNP£¨P versus NP, P vs NP£©¡±ÎÊÌâµÄÃèÊö¡¢ÄѶȡ¢¿ÉÄܵĴ𰸠¹Ø¼ü´Ê£ºP¶ÔNP£¬P versus NP£¬P vs NP£¬the Millennium Problems£¬Clay Mathematics Institute ¡°The P versus NP problem is to determine whether every language accepted by some nondeterministic algorithm in polynomial time is also accepted by some (deterministic) algorithm in polynomial time.¡± [1], now it becomes a famous mathematical fundamental problem, though it was being a hard open problem in the field of computational complexity theory in the theoretical computer science since the early 1970¡¯s [2]. ¡°P vs NP Problem¡± or ¡°P versus NP problem¡± becomes one of the most famous mathematical problems after the seven Millennium Problems released by Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000 [3]. Before this, in 1998, Steve Smale listed it as the third problem in his 18 great problems of the 21th century, i.e, ¡°Problem 3: Does P=NP?¡± [4]. After this, in 2005, Science magazine listed it as the 19th question of its top 25 of the 125 big questions face scientific inquiry over the next quarter-century, i.e., ¡°What are the limits of conventional computing?¡± [5]. P¡ÙNP is the mainstream perspective up to now. In 2002, a total of 100 people poll gave the following statistics [6]: ¡° 1. 61 thought P¡ÙNP. 2. 9 thought P=NP. 3. 4 thought that it is independent. While no particular axiom system was mentioned, I assume they think it is independent of ZFC. 4. 3 just stated that it is NOT independent of Primitive Recursive Arithmetic. 5. 1 said it would depend on the model. 6. 22 offered no opinion.¡± About 6000 papers each year discuss the ¡°NP-complete¡± or ¡°P vs NP¡± [7], the recent reviews and papers can see [8-12], et al. ²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×£º [1] COOK S. The P versus NP Problem, official problem description, [EB/OL]. http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/pvsnp.pdf [2] Öйú´ó°Ù¿ÆÈ«Ê镵ç×ÓѧÓë¼ÆËã»ú[M]. ±±¾©: Öйú´ó°Ù¿ÆÈ«Êé³ö°æÉç, 1986. Encyclopaedia of China • Electronics and computer [M]. Beijing: Encyclopaedia of China Publishing House, 1986. (in chinese) http://202.112.118.40:918/web/index.htm [3] THE CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE. P vs NP Problem [EB/OL]. http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/. [4] SMALE S. Mathematical problems for the next century [J]. Mathematical Intelligencer, 1998, 20(2): 7-15. [5] SEIFE C. What are the limits of conventional computing? [J]. Science, 2005, 309(5731): 96. [6] GASARCH W I. The P=?NP poll [J]. SIGACT News, 2002, 33(2): 34-47. [7] ALLENDER E. A status report on the P Versus NP question [J]. Advances in Computers, 2009, 77: 117-147. [8] FORTNOW L. The Status of the P versus NP Problem [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(9): 78-86. [9] COOK S. The importance of the P versus NP question [J]. Journal of the ACM, 2003, (50)1: 27-29. [10] GASSNER C. Oracles and relativizations of the P =? NP question for several structures [J]. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2009, 15(6): 1186-1205. [11] MANEA F, MARGENSTERN M, MITRANA V, PEREZ-JIMENEZ MJ. A new characterization of NP, P, and PSPACE with accepting hybrid networks of evolutionary processors [J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 2010, 46(2): 174-192. [12] MUKUND M. NP-Completeness not the same as separating P from NP [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(4): 9-9. [13] KURATOWSKI K, MOSTOWSKI A. Set theory [M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976. [14] HAZEWINKEL M. Encyclopaedia of mathematics: an updated and annotated translation of the Soviet ¡°Mathematical encyclopaedia¡±[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. ¡¶ËÕÁªÊýѧ°Ù¿ÆÈ«Êé¡·£¬http://eom.springer.de/ [15] HOPCROFT J E, MOTWANI R M, ULLMAN J D. Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation (Third edition) [M]. New Jersey: Addison Wesley, 2006. [16] GAREY M R, JOHNSON D S. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness [M]. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1979. [17] Nondeterministic Turing Machine [EB/OL]. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NondeterministicTuringMachine.html [18] CHAITIN G J. Information-theoretic computational complexity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1974, 20(1): 10-15. [19] Öйú´ó°Ù¿ÆÈ«Êé•Êýѧ[M]. ±±¾©: Öйú´ó°Ù¿ÆÈ«Êé³ö°æÉç, 1988. Encyclopaedia of China • Mathematics [M]. Beijing: Encyclopaedia of China Publishing House, 1988. (in chinese) http://202.112.118.40:918/web/index.htm |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
278Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
293µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ45È˻ظ´
22408 266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Àí¹¤085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì303·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ328·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
277Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
p-NPP·¨²â¶¨Ö¬·¾Ã¸»îÐÔp-NP±ê×¼ÇúÏßÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾×ªÌû¡¿¹ØÓÚNP£¬NP-hard£¬P£¬NPCµÈÏà¹ØÎÊÌâµÄÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿¸çµÂ°ÍºÕ²ÂÏë¿ÉÒÔÓÐÄÄЩӦÓÃ
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´

YANGZL
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 15558.4
- Ìû×Ó: 253
- ÔÚÏß: 499.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1422023
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µçÁ¦ÏµÍ³
|
Ò»µãеÄ˼¿¼£º ¸ù¾Ý¡¶¸ÅÂÊÂÛ¡·ÀïµÄÖÐÐļ«ÏÞ¶¨Àí£¬ÓÃȡֵ¶¼ÎªÕýÊýµÄ²»Í¬µÄ¡°¶ÀÁ¢Í¬·Ö²¼¡±¾ùÔÈ·Ö²¼Ëæ»úÊý£¨¶¼ÊÇÕýÊý£©×÷Ϊ¡°Íêȫͼ¡±ÉϱߵÄÈ¨ÖØ¡£ µ±ÍêȫͼµÄ½×ÊýÔ½À´Ô½´óʱ£¬ººÃܶû¶Ù»ØÂ·µÄ×ÜÈ¨ÖØ½¥½øÕý̬·Ö²¼£º¼´²»Í¬ººÃܶû¶Ù»ØÂ·Ö®¼äµÄ×ÜÈ¨ÖØ£¬¼¸ºõ²»ÄÜÓÃÈ·¶¨Ðͺ¯ÊýÏ໥¹¹Ôì³ö¡£±ØÐëÒÔ¡°¸ÅÂÊ1¡±¼ì²éËùÓеĺºÃܶû¶Ù»ØÂ·×ÜÈ¨ÖØ¡£ |

2Â¥2021-07-23 01:15:52
YANGZL
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 15558.4
- Ìû×Ó: 253
- ÔÚÏß: 499.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1422023
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µçÁ¦ÏµÍ³
|
ÓÐЩ¸ÅÂÊ·Ö²¼£¬Èç Weibull Distribution Exponential distribution Logarithmic Distribution Log-normal Distribution ×Ô±äÁ¿È¡Öµ¶¼ÊÇÕýµÄʵÊý¡£ ¸ù¾ÝCentral limit theorem£¬µ± sums or other functions of a large number of independent or weakly-dependent random variables have a probability distribution close to the normal distribution. µ±ÏîÊýÔ½À´Ô½´óʱ£¬Ç÷ÏòÓÚÕý̬·Ö²¼¡£ |

3Â¥2021-07-23 02:08:43














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥