| 查看: 4264 | 回复: 43 | |||
[交流]
Major Revisions 心中忐忑不安啊~~
|
|
Dear Dr. XXX: Manuscript ID XXXXXX entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewers have recommended publication, subject to major revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, we invite you to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX Editor, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 这个是编辑给我的信,这个信中说审稿人推荐发表,但要进行大修改。我看了一下comments,3个审稿人提出了18个问题,提的问题大部分比较尖锐,而且有2~3个我答不上来,没有丝毫看出来他们是推荐发表的意思,我比较困惑啊。我想问大家,我这文章是不是难逃被枪毙的命运? 谢谢大家的回复和帮助~~ |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
航天502所 高瑛珂博士 婚内征婚 欺骗女性开房
已经有9人回复
地球科学部D01口青年基金,最低几A几B几C才能有几率中呀。
已经有3人回复
投稿文章被秒拒了
已经有4人回复
招收2026级博士生
已经有6人回复
宿州学院学报
已经有5人回复
博士申请
已经有5人回复
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有7人回复
论文撤稿了
已经有9人回复
化学专业申博
已经有5人回复
医学类期刊求推荐
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
Major revisions needed因为语言问题
已经有7人回复
说一下我那曲折的投稿经历
已经有67人回复
Major Revisions and Second Review Needed提交后会怎么处理
已经有16人回复
Major revisions 接收的几率是多少啊 大不 有经历的谈谈。。。
已经有18人回复
Major Revisions and Second Review Needed还有机会吗
已经有11人回复
今天收到了major revisions的机会
已经有29人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
江西理工大学2026年博士研究生招生报名公告(第二批次),可以联系马胜灿老师
+2/908
山东征女友,坐标济南
+1/170
浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院张霈婧课题组招科研助理——生物信息方向
+2/110
测试█TEM/ EPR/ XPS/PY-GCMS/TG-IR/XRF/BET/MIP/核磁/EA/ICP,VX: 761711562。
+1/91
【通知】北京信息科技大学仪器科学与光电工程学院招收博士研究生(2026)
+1/84
福州大学化工学院电子化学品团队博士招生,还有一个名额!
+1/75
诚邀津门师者共研
+1/74
真诚寻找另一半 觉得合适可以相互了解
+1/64
寻找做兼职的同学,长期的(长三角:血管介入医疗器械方面兼职)
+1/36
未婚80后理工男_征珠三角如深圳或周边温柔贤惠孝勤女
+2/32
浙江理工大学国家级高层次人才团队招收能源光电催化材料方向博士生(截止5月31号)
+2/24
郑州大学·安徽高等研究院 2026年博士招生(申请考核制)
+1/13
【截止2026年5月31日】石家庄铁道大学智能交通课题组诚招理工科背景博士
+1/9
【26.9月入学】211大学补招学博1人(AI或控制方向)
+1/9
北理工国家杰青团队招博士后
+1/6
上海技物所多维探测课题组博士后招聘
+1/6
北理工国家杰青团队招博士后
+1/5
深圳大学材料学院“智能分子材料团队”招聘博士后(连续流微反应器方向优先)
+1/5
中山大学-柔性电子方向-博士研究生招生
+1/2
易度质量流量计在燃气阀流通性测试中的应用
+1/1
2楼2011-09-21 11:13:08
3楼2011-09-21 11:34:47
4楼2011-09-21 11:37:26
5楼2011-09-21 12:00:21
6楼2011-09-21 12:04:42
7楼2011-09-21 12:10:12
8楼2011-09-21 12:13:24
9楼2011-09-21 12:21:20
10楼2011-09-23 23:21:45
11楼2011-09-24 00:55:09
12楼2011-09-24 01:08:08
13楼2011-09-24 05:44:49
14楼2011-09-24 08:37:35
15楼2011-10-31 00:36:31
16楼2011-10-31 02:19:03
17楼2011-10-31 07:52:36
18楼2011-10-31 08:30:41
19楼2011-10-31 08:36:32
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
20楼2012-03-31 14:15:15
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
21楼2012-03-31 14:15:26
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
22楼2012-03-31 14:15:38
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
23楼2012-03-31 14:15:44
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
24楼2012-03-31 14:15:53
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
25楼2012-03-31 14:16:09
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
26楼2012-03-31 14:16:20
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
27楼2012-03-31 14:16:31
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
28楼2012-03-31 14:16:41
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
29楼2012-03-31 14:16:49
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
30楼2012-03-31 14:17:08
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
31楼2012-03-31 14:17:18
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
32楼2012-03-31 14:17:26
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
33楼2012-03-31 14:17:37
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
34楼2012-03-31 14:17:43
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
35楼2012-03-31 14:17:50
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
36楼2012-03-31 14:18:02
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
37楼2012-03-31 14:18:10
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
38楼2012-03-31 14:18:16
39楼2012-03-31 16:27:12
40楼2012-03-31 16:34:39
41楼2012-03-31 16:55:47
42楼2012-04-01 07:45:39
43楼2014-05-20 15:40:44
44楼2014-05-20 22:02:10












回复此楼
aimin1989



能回答的就好好回答