| ²é¿´: 4744 | »Ø¸´: 43 | |||
[½»Á÷]
Major Revisions ÐÄÖÐìþìý²»°²°¡~~
|
|
Dear Dr. XXX: Manuscript ID XXXXXX entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewers have recommended publication, subject to major revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, we invite you to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX Editor, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering Õâ¸öÊDZ༸øÎÒµÄÐÅ£¬Õâ¸öÐÅÖÐ˵Éó¸åÈËÍÆ¼ö·¢±í£¬µ«Òª½øÐдóÐ޸ġ£ÎÒ¿´ÁËÒ»ÏÂcomments£¬3¸öÉó¸åÈËÌá³öÁË18¸öÎÊÌ⣬ÌáµÄÎÊÌâ´ó²¿·Ö±È½Ï¼âÈñ£¬¶øÇÒÓÐ2~3¸öÎÒ´ð²»ÉÏÀ´£¬Ã»ÓÐË¿ºÁ¿´³öÀ´ËûÃÇÊÇÍÆ¼ö·¢±íµÄÒâ˼£¬ÎұȽÏÀ§»ó°¡¡£ÎÒÏëÎÊ´ó¼Ò£¬ÎÒÕâÎÄÕÂÊDz»ÊÇÄÑÌÓ±»Ç¹±ÐµÄÃüÔË£¿ лл´ó¼ÒµÄ»Ø¸´ºÍ°ïÖú~~ |
» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿´°åÉÏÕâô¶àÖеģ¬ÓеãÏñ50ÈËȺÀï49¸öÈ˶¼ÊÇÆ×ÓµÄÄÇÖָоõ¡¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÎÒ²»Àí½â£¡
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
2026ÄêµÄ¹ú¼ÒÉç¿Æ»ù½ðÏîĿͨѶÆÀÉóµÄйæÔòÓëж¯Ïò¡¢ÐÂÌôÕ½
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ϵͳ²é²»µ½
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ôõô²é°¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
·¶½øÖоÙÒ»ÎĵÄÖÐÐÄ˼Ïë
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Major revisions neededÒòΪÓïÑÔÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
˵һÏÂÎÒÄÇÇúÕÛµÄͶ¸å¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ67È˻ظ´
Major Revisions and Second Review NeededÌá½»ºó»áÔõô´¦Àí
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Major revisions ½ÓÊյļ¸ÂÊÊǶàÉÙ°¡ ´ó²» ÓоÀúµÄ̸̸¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Major Revisions and Second Review Needed»¹Óлú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
½ñÌìÊÕµ½ÁËmajor revisionsµÄ»ú»á
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| ºÃºÃÐÞ¸ÄÓ¦¸ÃûÎÊÌâ°É ÎÒµÄÒ²ÊǸոÕÐ޸ĻØÈ¥ |
2Â¥2011-09-21 11:13:08
3Â¥2011-09-21 11:34:47
4Â¥2011-09-21 11:37:26
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| ÎÒµÄÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˸øÁËСÐÞ£¬Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈ˼á¾ö²»Í¬Òâ·¢±í£¬±à¼¸øÁ˸ö´óÐÞ£¬ÕýÔÚÐÞ¸ÄÖУ¬ºÜ²»°²£¬²»ÖªµÀÐ޸ĺóÓÐϷû£¿ |
5Â¥2011-09-21 12:00:21
6Â¥2011-09-21 12:04:42
7Â¥2011-09-21 12:10:12
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
![]() ÄܻشðµÄ¾ÍºÃºÃ»Ø´ð ²»ÄܻشðµÄ¾ÍÇ«Ðéµã½âÊÍÏÂÄã×öµÄÄÄЩ£¬È»ºóÄÄЩ²»ÄÜ×ö Ö»ÒªÄã̬¶ÈÈÏÕæÕæ³Ï£¬¼¸ÂʺܴóµÄ |
8Â¥2011-09-21 12:13:24
leimiao_hit
ľ³æÖ®Íõ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
- SEPI: 7
- Ó¦Öú: 1336 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.707
- ½ð±Ò: 113738
- Ìû×Ó: 85000
- ÔÚÏß: 6307.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1264338
9Â¥2011-09-21 12:21:20
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
²»¿ÉÄܲ»Ð޸ġ£ ÓÃÐÄ˼Ð޸ģ¬Ã»ÓÐÎÊÌ⣬ףÄãºÃÔË£¡ |
10Â¥2011-09-23 23:21:45
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310.5
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| ´óÎÊÌâ²»Äܸģ¬×îºÃ¸ÄͶ¡£²»ÊÇ´óÎÊÌ⣬¾Í²»Òª·ÅÆú£¬¾¡Á¿¿ÍÆøµÄ½âÊÍ£¬Ç¿µ÷ÎÄÕµĹ±Ï×£¬ÄÇÑù±à¼ºÍÉó¸åÈËÒ²²»»á·ÅÆúÄãÕâÆªÎÄÕ¡£¡£¡£ |
11Â¥2011-09-24 00:55:09
gujunfei
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 817.4
- Ìû×Ó: 1042
- ÔÚÏß: 494.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 310394
12Â¥2011-09-24 01:08:08
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
±à¼µÄÐÅÒ»°ãÓ¦¸ÃÊÇģʽ»¯µÄ¡£²»±ØÌ«·ÅÔÚÐÄÉÏ¡£Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâÈ«²¿Ò»Ò»»Ø´ð£¬²»ÄÜ×öµ½µÄµØ·½³Ï¿ÒµÄ˵Ã÷ÔÒò¡£Ä¿Ç°¾ÍÖ»ÄÜÕâÑù¡£×£Â¥Ö÷¸ßÖС£ |
13Â¥2011-09-24 05:44:49
14Â¥2011-09-24 08:37:35
15Â¥2011-10-31 00:36:31
gujunfei
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 817.4
- Ìû×Ó: 1042
- ÔÚÏß: 494.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 310394
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ÄܻشðµÄ¾ÍºÃºÃ»Ø´ðÓÃÐÄ˼Ð޸ģ¬Ã»ÓÐÎÊÌ⣬ףÄãºÃÔË£¡ |
16Â¥2011-10-31 02:19:03
17Â¥2011-10-31 07:52:36
18Â¥2011-10-31 08:30:41
niubilitier
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 906.6
- Ìû×Ó: 1792
- ÔÚÏß: 235.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1104794
19Â¥2011-10-31 08:36:32
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
20Â¥2012-03-31 14:15:15
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
21Â¥2012-03-31 14:15:26
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
22Â¥2012-03-31 14:15:38
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
23Â¥2012-03-31 14:15:44
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
24Â¥2012-03-31 14:15:53
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
25Â¥2012-03-31 14:16:09
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
26Â¥2012-03-31 14:16:20
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
27Â¥2012-03-31 14:16:31
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
28Â¥2012-03-31 14:16:41
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
29Â¥2012-03-31 14:16:49
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
30Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:08
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
31Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:18
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
32Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:26
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
33Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:37
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
34Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:43
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
35Â¥2012-03-31 14:17:50
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
36Â¥2012-03-31 14:18:02
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
37Â¥2012-03-31 14:18:10
|
Dear Dr. DAN: Re: Manuscript ID 2011-0130.R1 entitled "XXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some further minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Sincerely, XXXX, Editor Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering |
38Â¥2012-03-31 14:18:16
39Â¥2012-03-31 16:27:12
niubilitier
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 906.6
- Ìû×Ó: 1792
- ÔÚÏß: 235.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1104794
40Â¥2012-03-31 16:34:39
41Â¥2012-03-31 16:55:47
42Â¥2012-04-01 07:45:39
43Â¥2014-05-20 15:40:44
44Â¥2014-05-20 22:02:10









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
aimin1989



ÄܻشðµÄ¾ÍºÃºÃ»Ø´ð
ͶƱ: