| 查看: 3249 | 回复: 18 | |||
[交流]
correct the grammar
|
|||
| We also tried to do SAED, but it is not succeeded because the carbon core is too large to do SAED. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
同一个分子,一条来自文献,一条来自AI——不告诉你答案,你会选哪条?
已经有6人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
|
SAED analysis was attempted but successful because the carbon core is too large - Don't write "We" Scientific work is not subjective - Don't write "do ___" Scientists might talk like that casually in the lab, but scientific writing should be more formal - Don't just write "SAED" and assume the reader knows exactly what that means Instead write "S__ A__ E__ D__ (SAED) analysis..." - Would the carbon core be smaller - just the right size for SAED" - if the specimen had been prepared more carefully ?? I was careful to not include the word "specimen" in the above sentence, but someone already experienced in SAED might notice |
16楼2016-06-21 10:07:28
2楼2011-08-17 16:55:26
7楼2011-08-17 17:05:32
phu_grassman
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 130
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.392
- 金币: 7538.7
- 帖子: 5611
- 在线: 1480.2小时
- 虫号: 1151372
8楼2011-08-17 17:06:18
9楼2011-08-17 17:25:20
12楼2015-05-28 11:53:26
13楼2015-05-28 18:31:22
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
15楼2016-06-21 07:41:45
17楼2016-06-21 10:12:53
18楼2018-06-24 15:54:07
19楼2018-06-26 18:14:19
简单回复
2011-08-17 16:56
回复
vanadate(金币+2):谢谢参与
水清浅《夏4楼
2011-08-17 16:56
回复
vanadate(金币+2):谢谢参与
2011-08-17 16:56
回复
2011-08-17 16:58
回复
vanadate(金币+2):谢谢参与
sgh_11910楼
2011-08-17 17:33
回复
ljason11楼
2011-08-17 19:01
回复
monicaci14楼
2015-07-01 20:19
回复


















回复此楼
