24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 786  |  回复: 3

gmg123456

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 与编辑审稿意见不一样,怎么办呀????

最近投了篇文章在《new  forests》,两个月后,文章的审稿意见出来了,大修,但是编辑有段话看不懂呀,麻烦各位大仙给看看。
Furthermore, the authors need to reconsider the organization of their results to improve the paper. The data of this paper can presented in only one Table and in a Figure. Most variables aren`t affected by the interaction between main factors (WS and AMF), so only results of main effects should be presented and not separated into the six treatments. This is the case of shoot and root dry weight, plant height, root length, water use efficiency, Chlorophyll concentration, all gas-exchange variables and qP. All these variables can be moved to a Table where variables must be rows and the columns must be the levels of the main factors (2 + 3 columns). At the right side of the table you can add your statistical analysis. Results on root colonization can be described in the text. Finally, RWC and results of the three reminder fluorescence variables can be presented in a figure made with four subfigures. In each subfigure, the six treatments should be presented separately. This would emphasize the interaction.
有两点不懂之处:
1、so only results of main effects should be presented and not separated into the six treatments.
2、the columns must be the levels of the main factors (2 + 3 columns).
如果我还是坚持自己原来的可以吗,或者有没必要给编辑部写封信讨论下这个问题。

所指表格见附图:
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xinongfish

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

师兄,这个问题貌似已经解决了,呵呵
2楼2011-11-25 09:23:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

olg2007621

铜虫 (小有名气)

咨询一下new forests的审稿周期
好好干,一定能出好东西的!
3楼2013-10-29 13:00:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kiyohawa

新虫 (小有名气)

1. WS和AMF的处理对water use efficiency和Chlorophyll concentration两个指标所实施的交互作用不显著,因此不要报道交互作用的结果;
2. 和上一条一样,就是不要报道交互作用,只分别报道WS和AMF的主效应因素就好了。
不偷不抢,不卑不亢
4楼2013-11-10 13:01:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gmg123456 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见