24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 949  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

gmg123456

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 与编辑审稿意见不一样,怎么办呀????

最近投了篇文章在《new  forests》,两个月后,文章的审稿意见出来了,大修,但是编辑有段话看不懂呀,麻烦各位大仙给看看。
Furthermore, the authors need to reconsider the organization of their results to improve the paper. The data of this paper can presented in only one Table and in a Figure. Most variables aren`t affected by the interaction between main factors (WS and AMF), so only results of main effects should be presented and not separated into the six treatments. This is the case of shoot and root dry weight, plant height, root length, water use efficiency, Chlorophyll concentration, all gas-exchange variables and qP. All these variables can be moved to a Table where variables must be rows and the columns must be the levels of the main factors (2 + 3 columns). At the right side of the table you can add your statistical analysis. Results on root colonization can be described in the text. Finally, RWC and results of the three reminder fluorescence variables can be presented in a figure made with four subfigures. In each subfigure, the six treatments should be presented separately. This would emphasize the interaction.
有两点不懂之处:
1、so only results of main effects should be presented and not separated into the six treatments.
2、the columns must be the levels of the main factors (2 + 3 columns).
如果我还是坚持自己原来的可以吗,或者有没必要给编辑部写封信讨论下这个问题。

所指表格见附图:
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kiyohawa

新虫 (小有名气)

1. WS和AMF的处理对water use efficiency和Chlorophyll concentration两个指标所实施的交互作用不显著,因此不要报道交互作用的结果;
2. 和上一条一样,就是不要报道交互作用,只分别报道WS和AMF的主效应因素就好了。
不偷不抢,不卑不亢
4楼2013-11-10 13:01:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

xinongfish

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

师兄,这个问题貌似已经解决了,呵呵
2楼2011-11-25 09:23:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

olg2007621

铜虫 (小有名气)

咨询一下new forests的审稿周期
好好干,一定能出好东西的!
3楼2013-10-29 13:00:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +10 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-26 11:25 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +22 koalala 2026-08-24 25/1250 2026-08-26 11:14 by dxcharlary
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +20 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 21/1050 2026-08-26 11:13 by wolfgangHugh
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +6 process2012 2026-08-23 8/400 2026-08-26 11:03 by zjlp
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +3 huang1991js 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:48 by lnliuchunlei
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +21 羊腰板 2026-08-21 24/1200 2026-08-26 07:20 by finnigan
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 20+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 19/950 2026-08-25 17:57 by chick875
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见